bug-coreutils archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:snapshot: 406 ]

Total 406 documents matching your query.

101. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:46:03 +0100
With the above snapshot and --disable-acl, all of the default tests, including those enabled via RUN_VERY_EXPENSIVE_TESTS pass. as for the check-root tests: this one now passes: special-bits these fa
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00129.html (11,034 bytes)

102. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:46:30 +0100
Thanks for testing it. It looks like they're all due to the fact that you used NON_ROOT_USERNAME=nobody and "nobody" lacks access to required files. Can you run it again, as recommended in README i.e
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00146.html (10,541 bytes)

103. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:35:02 +0100
D'oh -- should've read that. So, with 6.10 and --disable-acl, all of the non-root tests pass and a single root-only test fails: % tar xf coreutils-6.10.tar.gz % cd coreutils-6.10 % ./configure --disa
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00164.html (11,781 bytes)

104. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:40:22 +0100
... Thanks for the report and details. That's probably due to your running the root-only tests in a directory with the sticky set-GID bit set. If that's the problem, here's an untested fix: * tests/c
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00166.html (9,488 bytes)

105. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:32:19 +0100
Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to help. % tar xf coreutils-6.10.tar.gz % cd coreutils-6.10 % cat ~/foo.patch diff --git a/tests/cp/preserve-gid b/tests/cp/preserve-gid index 5f2c050..e96a0bd 100755
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00173.html (11,806 bytes)

106. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:58:34 +0100
Thanks for checking. That suggests there's a more fundamental problem. Please do this as root: cd coreutils-6.10/src ./id -a ./rm -rf f g echo a > f ./chown +0:+0 f ls -ld . f ./cp f g ls -l g and lo
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00209.html (8,543 bytes)

107. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:39:03 +0100
For some reason it doesn't. uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel),1(daemon),8(procview), 2(kmem),29(certusers),3(sys),9(procmod),4(tty), 102(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),5(operator),80(admin),20(
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00214.html (9,746 bytes)

108. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:54:58 +0100
That suggests that the bogus group is set by cp's open call. I suspect some sort of ACL mechanism that specifies "staff" as the default group -- or maybe some rule says "inherit group from parent dir
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00215.html (9,692 bytes)

109. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:19:12 +0100
The darwin equivalent appears to be ktrace. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00216.html (6,997 bytes)

110. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:08:50 +0100
Indeed. While ktrace came with darwin8, it no longer comes with darwin9, though. -- Elias Attachment: pgpNxgZ2RuXQY.pgp Description: PGP signature
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00217.html (7,109 bytes)

111. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:16:08 +0100
The latter seems to be the case. /tmp uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel),1(daemon),8(procview), 2(kmem),29(certusers),3(sys),9(procmod),4(tty), 102(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),5(operator),80(
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00218.html (9,836 bytes)

112. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:36:23 +0100
It does, indeed. Please see if this makes the test pass: Avoid cp/preserve-gid test failure on Mac OS 10.5.1 (Darwin 9.1) * tests/cp/preserve-gid: Set group as well as owner on ".". Reported by Elias
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00220.html (9,612 bytes)

113. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:55:32 +0100
The test still fails, but it gets a whole lot further :D -- Elias Attachment: preserve-gid_test_new Description: Text document Attachment: preserve-gid_test.diff Description: Text document Attachment
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00226.html (9,950 bytes)

114. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:34:17 +0100
Good. Progress :) Here's an additional patch that should get us past the latest failure. diff --git a/tests/cp/preserve-gid b/tests/cp/preserve-gid index 9537dc0..15bb51c 100755 -- a/tests/cp/preserv
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00228.html (9,795 bytes)

115. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:37:37 +0100
Unfortunately, it doesn't. -- Elias Attachment: preserve-gid_test_new2 Description: Text document Attachment: preserve-gid_test2.diff Description: Text document Attachment: pgpNgJouIFK6n.pgp Descript
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00230.html (9,305 bytes)

116. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:06:58 +0100
... But it came close :-) Thanks for the quick feedback. I should have matched the whole command, from "setuidgid -g...cp", not just "cp". Here's a better one: * tests/cp/preserve-gid: accommodate Da
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00231.html (8,655 bytes)

117. Re: new snapshot [Re: coreutils 6.9.92 fail to configure on *bsd (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:44:43 +0100
More progress! (still fails) -- Elias Attachment: preserve-gid_test_new3 Description: Text document Attachment: preserve-gid_test3.diff Description: Text document Attachment: pgpZOfRRHjzkV.pgp Descri
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-01/msg00236.html (9,076 bytes)

118. new coreutils snapshot [Re: printf failure on HP/UX 10.20 with 6.9.92 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:03:37 +0100
Thanks for testing that. In case you're still inclined, here's a coreutils development snapshot: It includes the gnulib fix and tests. coreutils snapshot: http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.gz 8
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-02/msg00096.html (6,733 bytes)

119. new coreutils snapshot (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:22:35 +0100
My big test factorization changes broke at least two tests. Thanks to Peter Fales for spotting and reporting the new failures. Here is a new snapshot that fixes them: coreutils snapshot: http://meyer
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-02/msg00099.html (4,679 bytes)

120. new coreutils snapshot available (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:27:19 +0100
There have been over 50 change-sets since the last one, so... coreutils snapshot: http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.gz 8.9 MB http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.lzma 3.6 MB http://meyering
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-03/msg00061.html (6,108 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu