bug-coreutils archive search

41. Re: one last snapshot before test release (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:12:33 -0600

Jim Meyering wrote: Matthew Woehlke <address@hidden> wrote: Paul Eggert wrote: Matthew Woehlke <address@hidden> writes: Hooboy. sort-compress failed spectacularly on OSF. From the errors (lots of "ta

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-02/msg00201.html (12,227 bytes)

42. final snapshot before coreutils-6.8 (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 14:08:38 +0100

Here is one last snapshot. Note the new use of "+" as a pre-release indicator. Somehow, that sounds better than "-dirty" :-) http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.7+.tar.gz http://meyering.net/cu/coreut

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-02/msg00242.html (4,505 bytes)

43. Re: final snapshot before coreutils-6.8 (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:37:14 -0700

According to Jim Meyering on 2/24/2007 6:08 AM: Except that when incrementally compiling a git snapshot, I get: $ make cd . && /bin/sh /home/eblake/coreutils/build-aux/missing --run aclocal-1.10a -I

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-02/msg00245.html (5,393 bytes)

44. Re: final snapshot before coreutils-6.8 (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:15:25 +0100

Yep, that's inevitable if you update and just "make". As you've seen before, that's not always going to work. You need to rerun ./bootstrap. In this case, you might be able to get by with just "autom

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-02/msg00246.html (4,873 bytes)

45. coreutils snapshot (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:11:16 +0100

I've just made a snapshot: http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.8+.tar.gz

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-02/msg00308.html (3,715 bytes)

46. new snapshot (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:48:21 +0100

Another new snapshot. This includes fixes for the cp -x bug and for an ia64/linux-specific failure of the pwd-unreadable-parent test: http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.8+.tar.gz

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-03/msg00020.html (3,806 bytes)

47. coreutils snapshot (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:00:24 +0200

FYI, I've made a snapshot of the coreutils trunk: http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9+.tar.gz http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9+.tar.gz.sig Here are most of the intervening ChangeLog entries: [ F

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-04/msg00109.html (6,282 bytes)

48. new coreutils snapshot (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:05:16 +0200

Since the last snapshot, not much has changed in coreutils proper, but some of the recent changes in gnulib that may have an effect. 2007-04-25 Jim Meyering <address@hidden> * src/du.c (usage): Clari

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-04/msg00130.html (4,512 bytes)

49. a few improvements pushed, and a new snapshot (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:06:29 +0200

Here's the latest snapshot: http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9+.tar.gz The distinction between the cut changes (classified as bug fixes) and the stty change is, um... subtle. http://git.sv.gnu.org/

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-05/msg00201.html (4,811 bytes)

50. coreutils snapshot: 2007-08-21 (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:06:56 +0200

FYI, here's a snapshot, with all the latest bits: http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9+.tar.gz http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9+.tar.gz.sig Aka, http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9+-ss-2007-08-2

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-08/msg00137.html (4,357 bytes)

51. new coreutils snapshot (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:21:26 +0200

The latest coreutils snapshot is here (note the new naming scheme): http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9-ss.tar.gz http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-6.9-ss.tar.gz.sig Those files are just links to the

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-09/msg00002.html (4,189 bytes)

52. rm: two small bug fixes + new snapshot (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:47:25 +0200

I tried to remove a directory and got errors about "Too many levels of symbolic links", while I expected a mere "Permission denied". The patches below were the result. I've put new snapshots here: ht

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-09/msg00128.html (9,039 bytes)

53. new snapshot (rm fixes and new program: mktemp) (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:05:57 +0200

In addition to adding mktemp, I've fixed a few low-probability bugs in rm. This also includes a lot of new code from gnulib, by virtue of coreutils now requiring the vasprintf-posix module (mostly fo

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-10/msg00056.html (6,754 bytes)

54. Re: new snapshot (rm fixes and new program: mktemp) (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 07:49:24 -0400

thanks for this chcon fails on my non-selinux system during `make check` ... looks like it should be an XFAIL when selinux support is disabled btw, where are the colors coming from ? is that coreutil

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-10/msg00057.html (6,822 bytes)

55. Re: new snapshot (rm fixes and new program: mktemp) (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:11:07 +0200

Thanks for the quick feedback. I presume you mean the root-only tests/misc/chcon test (btw, it works for me) If so, please send chcon.log after doing this as root: cd tests/misc && make check TESTS=c

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-10/msg00058.html (7,174 bytes)

56. Re: new snapshot (rm fixes and new program: mktemp) (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:28:10 -0400

yep attached -mike Attachment: signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. FAIL: chcon (exit: 1) == + chcon --version chcon (GNU coreutils) 6.9-316-e6f4b Copyright (C) 2007 Fr

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-10/msg00059.html (14,664 bytes)

57. Re: new snapshot (rm fixes and new program: mktemp) (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:03:30 +0200

This ought to make it skip: diff --git a/tests/misc/chcon b/tests/misc/chcon index 46aaf87..851b415 100755 -- a/tests/misc/chcon +++ b/tests/misc/chcon @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ if test "$VERBOSE" = yes; then

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-10/msg00060.html (7,432 bytes)

58. Re: new snapshot (rm fixes and new program: mktemp) (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:30:16 -0400

this fixed it for me -mike Attachment: signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-10/msg00061.html (7,103 bytes)

59. Re: new snapshot (rm fixes and new program: mktemp) (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:13:32 +0200

Jim Meyering wrote on 08-10-07 11:05: In addition to adding mktemp, I've fixed a few low-probability bugs in rm. This also includes a lot of new code from gnulib, by virtue of coreutils now requiring

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-10/msg00063.html (9,881 bytes)

60. Re: new snapshot (rm fixes and new program: mktemp) (score: 1)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:18:19 +0200

Jim Meyering wrote on 08-10-07 11:05: In addition to adding mktemp, I've fixed a few low-probability bugs in rm. This also includes a lot of new code from gnulib, by virtue of coreutils now requiring

/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-10/msg00064.html (7,682 bytes)