coreutils archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:snapshot: 365 ]

Total 365 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.150-4ab87 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:33:12 +0000
Right, but we pass an int to these macros, so could they be doing anything but referencing the relevant bits? BTW in case WEXITSTATUS isn't always one wider than WTERMSIG, it would be more general to
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00046.html (11,090 bytes)

122. Re: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.150-4ab87 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:01:36 -0700
the interesting content is in its own wiki on the same site, same restrictions: http://posix.rhansen.org:9001/p/bug947 My apologies for not mentioning the first time: username 'posix', password '2115
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00047.html (9,228 bytes)

123. Re: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.150-4ab87 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 02:31:37 +0000
Patch is attached, fixing/simplifying the test, and adding lots of info about exit status limits. thanks again, Pádraig. Attachment: kill-large-signals.patch Description: Text Data
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00048.html (9,120 bytes)

124. Re: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.150-4ab87 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:30:48 +0000
s/ulimit_supported/ulimit_supported_/ typo fixed in that Yes it does. In fact 1.576MB over the base determined value was needed. I've bumped the value to $base+4000 While testing on FreeBSD 10 I also
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00050.html (9,885 bytes)

125. Re: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.150-4ab87 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:45:28 +0000
It wasn't stored in the hash actually, because on BTRFS the link count for a dir is always 1 (so there is no limit on the number of subdirs). The attached patch always hashes specified source dirs. c
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00051.html (9,404 bytes)

126. Re: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.150-4ab87 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:56:57 +0000
This is triggered by /home being a BTRFS subvolume. Avoidance patch attached. Patch attached. cheers, Pádraig Attachment: df-mount-list-on-fail.patch Description: Text Data Attachment: df-symlink-su
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00052.html (9,624 bytes)

127. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.150-4ab87 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:40:13 +0000
We plan to release coreutils-8.25 early next week, so any testing you can do on various different systems between now and then would be most welcome. -- You can download the coreutils snapshot in xz
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00053.html (8,732 bytes)

128. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:46:09 +0000
Fedora 23, x86_64, GCC 5.1.1 coreutils: PASS: 514 SKIP: 96 gnulib: PASS: 297 SKIP: 11 FreeBSD 10.2, x86_64, GCC 6.0.0 coreutils: PASS: 424 SKIP: 155 FAIL: 1 tests/rm/dangling-symlink.sh false positiv
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00057.html (10,409 bytes)

129. Re: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:09:44 -0500
Hello Pádraig and all, With this new version (8.24.161), only 3 lesser issues remain. The other issues I mentioned with 8.24.150 are resolved. 1. Compiling with Tiny-C Compiler (due to tcc bug). 2.
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00058.html (9,152 bytes)

130. Re: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:08:39 +0000
Grr. Does increasing the adjustment value above 4000 help? I'd need access to that particular system to debug. I suppose we could s/framework_failure_/ret=$?/ here and rely on the subsequent skip_ No
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00059.html (9,644 bytes)

131. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 16:36:33 +0000
Nearly there. I plan to release tomorrow. I've just committed a further two test fixes: http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commitdiff;h=v8.24-162-gcc05c3c http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00063.html (10,084 bytes)

132. Re: [platform-testers] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:06:31 -0500
2. On FreeBSD-9.3,amd64, "tests/misc/head-c" fails with: == + head --bytes=-9223372036854775807 head: memory exhausted == Grr. Does increasing the adjustment value above 4000 help? 5100 and above pa
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00064.html (8,767 bytes)

133. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:18:13 -0500
Sorry for the last-minute post, but found 4 failures that might relate to GPFS file-system ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_General_Parallel_File_System ). The system is CentOS 7 kernel 3.10.0-229
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00065.html (8,609 bytes)

134. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 19:27:34 +0000
General problem with tail really on any remote file system. tail: 'a' has been replaced with a remote file. giving up on this name We should probably disable inotify if there are no files opened, as
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00066.html (9,106 bytes)

135. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:31:42 -0500
-2016-01-18 12:21:28.294123000 -0500 +2016-01-18 12:21:28.296528000 -0500 cp -Pp didn't seem to preserve the timestamp on GPFS. I'd need access to the system to see why. I'd test with touch -d '...'
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00067.html (9,392 bytes)

136. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:38:38 -0500
On 01/18/2016 03:31 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote: On 01/18/2016 02:27 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 18/01/16 18:18, Assaf Gordon wrote: FAIL: tests/cp/preserve-slink-time -2016-01-18 12:21:28.294123000 -050
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00068.html (9,846 bytes)

137. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:59:29 -0500
On 01/18/2016 03:38 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote: On 01/18/2016 03:31 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote: On 01/18/2016 02:27 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 18/01/16 18:18, Assaf Gordon wrote: FAIL: tests/cp/preserve-sl
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00069.html (9,169 bytes)

138. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 22:31:48 +0000
Seems like a cache coherency issue. We can work around it with retry_delay_() but it would be good to avoid. Does a `sync d2` after the cp help?
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00070.html (9,212 bytes)

139. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:03:20 +0000
3 patches attached that hopefully address these issues. thanks, Pádraig. Attachment: 8.25-gpfs-fixes.patch Description: Text Data
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00071.html (9,111 bytes)

140. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-8.24.161-1204d (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:45:45 -0500
On 01/19/2016 11:03 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 18/01/16 19:27, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 18/01/16 18:18, Assaf Gordon wrote: Sorry for the last-minute post, but found 4 failures that might relate to
/archive/html/coreutils/2016-01/msg00072.html (7,727 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu