Hi, The default tests pass on my Ubuntu 18.04.4 x86_64 system: == Testsuite summary for GNU coreutils 8.31.90-cc4c == == Thanks, Erik -- Conventional Li-Ion batteries have been known to catch fire an
Hello Pádraig, It builds fine, and reproducibly on Guix System (current master; ba8992d28b1616d05b7cb04ef032944c5d19cd5a); build log attached. Guix has been disabling tests/misc/env-S.pl ;; This tes
Hello Pádraig, We plan to release coreutils-8.32 in the coming week so any testing you can do on various different systems between now and then would be most welcome. It builds fine, and reproducibl
... Neither xz-5.0.0 (used in the bootstrap) nor the more current 5.2.4 can be built with a simple compiler (like tcc); it depends on a fairly recent gcc 4, and thus fairly recent glibc. Those are no
On 2/27/20 7:25 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 27/02/2020 18:23, Pádraig Brady wrote: We plan to release coreutils-8.32 in the coming week so any testing you can do on various different systems betwee
All coreutils tests pass on macOS Catalina (darwin 19.2.0), with the attached adjustments to two tests. In summary this adjusts for apfs not creating holes < 16MiB, and darwin allowing (dereferencing
We plan to release coreutils-8.32 in the next few days so any testing you can do on various different systems between now and then would be most welcome. -- You can download the coreutils snapshot in
The problem with tests/misc/env-S.pl is that it needs "env" pre-installed and residing in either /bin or /usr/bin, which do not exist in the Guix build container. From running it through 'strace': 43
It builds fine, and reproducibly on Guix System (current master; ba8992d28b1616d05b7cb04ef032944c5d19cd5a); build log attached. Guix has been disabling tests/misc/env-S.pl ;; This test hits the 127
Really? Can you send a trace of 'make check TESTS=tests/misc/env-S.pl'? Curious how it is supposed to work... What do you mean? The build process really only does "./configure; make; make check", we
Really? Can you send a trace of 'make check TESTS=tests/misc/env-S.pl'? Curious how it is supposed to work... Oops I typod my grep. I do see the /usr/bin/env now. The reason is, where we run env with
On 04/03/2020 14:46, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 04/03/2020 13:44, Marius Bakke wrote: Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> writes: >> I don't see /bin/env being used here. Really? Can you send a trace of 'm
Thanks! It fixed most of the failing tests, but missed the first five: FAIL: tests/misc/env-S == env (GNU coreutils) 8.31.99-f2034 Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GN
On 04/03/2020 14:46, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 04/03/2020 13:44, Marius Bakke wrote: Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> writes: >> I don't see /bin/env being used here. Really? Can you send a trace of '
Thank *you* for the quick fixes! I can confirm that all tests pass in Guix with the above patches. \o/ == Testsuite summary for GNU coreutils 8.31.99-f2034 == == Attachment: signature.asc Description
We plan to release coreutils-9.0 in the coming week so any testing you can do on various different systems between now and then would be most welcome. -- You can download the coreutils snapshot in xz
Hi Pádraig, Just wondering, but, do you think you will include this one? https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2021-04/msg00049.html Thanks, Carl We plan to release coreutils-9.0 in the comin
Just wondering, but, do you think you will include this one? https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2021-04/msg00049.html Oh right sorry. If not in this release it will probably be in the next.
-- You can download the coreutils snapshot in xz format (5.3 MB) from: https://pixelbeat.org/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.xz And verify with gpg or md5sum with: https://pixelbeat.org/cu/coreutils-ss