Yes, it does! I've tried repeatedly and it always passes, even on a cold run (which is when it was most likely to fail before). Thanks! I still get this du failure though: tests/du/basic: http://spru
Is that an intermittent failure? My only guess is that the allocations for the files are changing asynchronously due to background compression or something. This change will avoid that part of the te
I can't repro on a 6.2 kernel, so problematic combo is: coreutils >= 9.0, kernel <= 6.1, BTRFS, sparse input file, cp --reflink=never Fedora has default BTRFS but all releases with coreutils >= 9.0 h
Yeah, it is. We're all good now on master other than the tty thing which we already discussed. Many thanks for your patience in digging into these with me! best, sam Attachment: signature.asc Descrip
We plan to release coreutils-9.4 in the coming week so any testing you can do on various different systems between now and then would be most welcome. This is a stabilization release coming about 18
0 test failures on Debian 11.7 amd64 0 test failures on Fedora 38 amd64 (with ASAN enabled) 1 gnulib test failure on Debian 12.0 arm64 (m1 icestorm) test-fcntl.c:275: assertion 'fcntl (fd, F_DUPFD_CL
0 test failures on macos 12.6 on arm64 (m1) 0 test failures on solaris 11 on amd64 with this getrandom patch to fix 5 failures: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2023-08/msg00057.html 0 te
We plan to release coreutils-9.4 in the coming week so any testing you can do on various different systems between now and then would be most welcome. This is a stabilization release coming about 18
We plan to release coreutils-9.4 in the next few days so any testing you can do on various different systems between now and then would be most welcome. This is a stabilization release coming about 1
Ah, sorry, I thought I had but I couldn't find it after looking briefly. It seems to happen more on cold builds for some reason. I know it's really awkward given you can't repro it - can you help me
We plan to release coreutils-9.5 in the coming week so any testing you can do on various different systems between now and then would be most welcome. This release comes about 30 weeks after the 9.4
I hit this build failure on Linux with GCC 14: src/uname.c: In function '__eat_cpuinfo_space': src/uname.c:173:29: error: implicit declaration of function 'isspace' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
We plan to release coreutils-9.5 in the coming week so any testing you can do on various different systems between now and then would be most welcome. This release comes about 30 weeks after the 9.4
We plan to release coreutils-9.5 in the next few days so any testing you can do on various different systems between now and then would be most welcome. This release comes about 30 weeks after the 9.
0 test failures on Fedora 39 amd64 (with ASAN enabled) 0 test failures on macOS 12.6 arm64 (m1) FAIL: tests/chown/preserve-root == Bruno already reported. Not a new issue. Due to "chgrp: invalid grou