- 1. Re: [GNUnet-developers] / [Ring] Question (score: 567)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:05:14 +0200
- Well, I may be able to partially answer that question: Speaking for the GNUnet side, I personally simply don't think GNUnet is quite ready for GNU Ring at this time. Specifically, we need to make GNU
- /archive/html/gnunet-developers/2017-09/msg00016.html (8,196 bytes)
- 2. Re: [GNUnet-developers] / [Ring] Question (score: 564)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:34:45 -0300
- That issue with battery consumption is indeed problematic. I'm not an expert on network stuff, but I wonder if there is a way to make a distinguished "packet" that tells GNUnet (or GNU Ring) the peer
- /archive/html/gnunet-developers/2017-09/msg00025.html (9,100 bytes)
- 3. Re: [GNUnet-developers] / [Ring] Question (score: 564)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 20:40:57 +0200
- Well, I'd not want to expose that kind of level of detail, but simply communicate "on battery" vs. "on the grid". But yes, adding such a flag to the respective GNUnet message is (part of) the plan. A
- /archive/html/gnunet-developers/2017-09/msg00026.html (9,383 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu