bug-gnulib archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ VMS: 278 ]

Total 278 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#16467: Diffutils 3.3 v. VMS (et al.) (score: 33)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:19:21 -0800
You need more old-junk computers in your collection. I've already got too many, thanks. I assume that this constitutes a bug in the Tru64 C RTL I'd call it a bug, but strictly speaking POSIX allows
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2014-01/msg00080.html (5,574 bytes)

122. Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#16467: Diffutils 3.3 v. VMS (et al.) (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:37:43 -0600 (CST)
Thanks for the prompt response. You need more old-junk computers in your collection. I assume so. If HAVE_DECL_STRTOLL is back in the generated config.h file, then that's good enough for me. Strictly
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2014-01/msg00079.html (7,647 bytes)

123. Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#16467: Diffutils 3.3 v. VMS (et al.) (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:04:34 -0800
I think it's a gnulib bug. We don't run into compilers lacking 'long long' often nowadays, so I'm not surprised the bug is there. I pushed the following patch to gnuliband am cc'ing to bug-gnulib. Do
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2014-01/msg00071.html (6,781 bytes)

124. Re: tmpdir.c:path_search() v. VMS (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 06:05:09 -0700
Thanks, I installed this: -- ChangeLog | 7 +++++++ lib/tmpdir.c | 6 +++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 9b0cccd..fac6e06 100644 -- a/Chang
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-07/msg00030.html (6,464 bytes)

125. Re: tmpdir.c:path_search() v. VMS (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:47:17 -0500 (CDT)
When in doubt, don't do it, I always say. Sounds safer (though still less clear than "= 0", I claim). Yeah, it's harmless. I didn't remember seeing it in the original (right-order) arg list, so I was
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-07/msg00026.html (5,770 bytes)

126. Re: tmpdir.c:path_search() v. VMS (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:48:23 -0700
Thanks, I fixed that typo. (No need for the "(int)" type cast around here, either.) The cast is needed on some platforms, and shouldn't hurt on VMS. "bool" has that property in C99, as well as in the
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-07/msg00025.html (6,066 bytes)

127. Re: tmpdir.c:path_search() v. VMS (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:45:15 -0700
Sorry, I don't know VMS so I'm flying blind here. How about this instead? add_slash = false;
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-07/msg00024.html (5,287 bytes)

128. Re: tmpdir.c:path_search() v. VMS (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:39:36 -0500 (CDT)
Oooh, I don't think that I'd do that. If the victim specifies a VMS directory, like, say, "dkc0:[sms]", for TMPDIR, then a ":" test on the last character will fail. As usual, everything's complicated
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-07/msg00023.html (5,907 bytes)

129. Re: tmpdir.c:path_search() v. VMS (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:10:33 -0500 (CDT)
+ sprintf (tmpl + dlen, &"/%.*sXXXXXX"[!add_slash], pfx, (int) plen); Around here, I get fewer %SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO run-time complaints if I reorder the arguments: sprintf (tmpl + dlen, &"/%.*sXXXXXX"[!a
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-07/msg00022.html (6,429 bytes)

130. Re: tmpdir.c:path_search() v. VMS (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:34:29 -0700
Come to think of it, the code can be simplified; there's no need for a while loop there. I installed the following patch instead. diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 4d73a26..9b0cccd 100644 -- a
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-07/msg00021.html (7,970 bytes)

131. Re: tmpdir.c:path_search() v. VMS (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:46:18 -0700
Thanks for the heads up. I pushed this but have not tested under VMS, so please give it a try. -- ChangeLog | 12 ++++++++++++ lib/tmpdir.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-07/msg00020.html (8,131 bytes)

132. tmpdir.c:path_search() v. VMS (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 13:30:39 -0500 (CDT)
While trying to get Wget to work on VMS (again), I ran into a problem with tmpdir.c:path_search(). The Wget maintainer denied responsibility, and suggested that I direct my complaint here. -- lib/tmp
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-07/msg00019.html (6,134 bytes)

133. Re: Gzip 1.6 v. Tru64 and VMS (score: 33)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:55:10 -0700
Thanks, for that problem I installed the following gnulib patch. There's no need for HAVE_STDLIB_H these days, as we're assuming C89 or better now for that sort of thing. * lib/getcwd-lgpl.c: Include
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-06/msg00034.html (6,039 bytes)

134. Re: test-fdutimensat racy? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:02:59 +0100
Excellent. This is the truncated exponential backoff method I was referring to previously (albeit a little less general). It's probably worth a comment that this may introduce a total delay of up to:
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-05/msg00085.html (14,668 bytes)

135. Re: test-fdutimensat racy? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 07:08:59 -0600
Interesting, but problematic on mingw: unlink() of an open fd is not guaranteed to succeed, and indeed fails on mingw; you can also provoke the failure in some NFS setups. You'd need to add some clea
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-05/msg00084.html (7,917 bytes)

136. Re: test-fdutimensat racy? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:52:26 +0200
Playing with the code a bit and testing on various VMs (where the race showed up most probably), it turned out that the multiplier for the nap() delay is not sufficient. Changing it from 1.125 to 3
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-05/msg00083.html (12,153 bytes)

137. Re: test-fdutimensat racy? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:23:39 -0700
In looking at the test, I do see some race conditions that could be triggered by high load, or by clocks running at slightly different speeds on a file server versus its client. I fixed the problems
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-05/msg00001.html (22,822 bytes)

138. Re: test-fdutimensat racy? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 02:03:51 +0100
While it may be a kernel bug triggering the ctime issue, it would be best to report that and try to avoid by retrying with another nap() up to some maximum. A more adaptive approach might be better t
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-04/msg00077.html (6,188 bytes)

139. Re: test-fdutimensat racy? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 00:14:27 +0200
Yes, I've seen those repeatedly, over the years, especially in VMs, and more likely when run in parallel with other tests. Here's one thread about it: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/20
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-04/msg00076.html (5,539 bytes)

140. Re: [PATCH] execute: drop dead code (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 02:10:16 +0100
Hi Eric, OK for the argumentation for the POSIXy systems. But for the Windows/mingw libc, I would be more careful. mingw is a moving target (it moves closer towards POSIX over time), and has EINTR. I
/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-03/msg00009.html (7,616 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu