autoconf archive search

181. Re: Autotest usage outside the Autoconf (score: 33)

Author: Alexey Mahotkin <alexm@hsys.msk.ru>

Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 23:42:23 +0400 (MSD)

Thanks! I'd like a variation on AT_CHECK that _doesn't_ provide such mini environments :) =) Uniformity. --alexm

/archive/html/autoconf/2001-09/msg00083.html (4,970 bytes)

182. Re: FYI: Ultrix autotest/autoconf problem fix (score: 33)

Author: Harlan Stenn <stenn@whimsy.udel.edu>

Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 19:34:03 -0500

Hi Pavel, The/a/some problem still exists under Ultrix. I am seriously overloaded with projects at the moment, but I'll see what I can find out. Harlan

/archive/html/autoconf/2001-03/msg00037.html (4,140 bytes)

183. Re: FYI: Ultrix autotest/autoconf problem fix (score: 33)

Author: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>

Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 19:11:08 -0500 (EST)

Hello, Harlan! It has been fixed since then, but that was a message on address@hidden that the above warning still appears on Tru64 v5.1. Please test CVS Autoconf on your system and try to understand

/archive/html/autoconf/2001-03/msg00036.html (4,686 bytes)

184. Re: FYI: Ultrix autotest/autoconf problem fix (score: 33)

Author: Harlan Stenn <stenn@whimsy.udel.edu>

Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:50:16 -0500

Akim, Is this what you were expecting? I did a fresh build of the latest autoconf ( did a cvs update moments before building). Harlan -- % make check ... % make check ... mv testsuite.tmp testsuite /

/archive/html/autoconf/2001-02/msg00211.html (6,932 bytes)

185. FYI: Ultrix autotest/autoconf problem fix (score: 33)

Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>

Date: 28 Feb 2001 10:40:23 +0100

Harlan, I think this will fix your issue. Thanks for the report! Index: ChangeLog from Akim Demaille <address@hidden> * tests/atgeneral.m4 (AT_INIT): Warn when at-check-line is missing. * tests/tools

/archive/html/autoconf/2001-02/msg00202.html (7,141 bytes)

186. Re: Ultrix autotest/autoconf problem (score: 33)

Author: akim@lrde.epita.fr

Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:05:12 +0100

A first quick reading seems to demonstrate you found a flow in the test suite itself, we should not conditionally run tests. Better have them be skipped. Thanks, I'll keep you informed!

/archive/html/autoconf/2001-02/msg00198.html (4,501 bytes)

187. Ultrix autotest/autoconf problem (score: 33)

Author: Harlan Stenn <stenn@whimsy.udel.edu>

Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:12:08 -0500

Here's the log generated from running: % sh -x ./testsuite 1 >& sh-x.log -- + test -n + test -n + expr a : \(a\) as_expr=expr + rm -f conf23322 conf23322.exe conf23322.file + echo + ln -s conf23322.f

/archive/html/autoconf/2001-02/msg00196.html (14,478 bytes)

188. Re: verbose testsuite output contains 1M newlines (score: 20)

Author: Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>

Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:14:21 -0600

According to Ralf Wildenhues on 11/23/2008 9:37 AM: Here's my proposal for the autotest side - ignore-nolog, stdout-nolog, and stderr-nolog. If you like this, then I can follow up with an m4 patch to

/archive/html/autoconf/2009-04/msg00039.html (14,083 bytes)

189. Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK (score: 18)

Author: Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>

Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:06:21 -0600

According to Thomas Moulard on 4/13/2009 6:00 AM: autotest can be made to guarantee that the binary under test IS in your PATH. That's the point of the AUTOTEST_PATH special variable, which in turn i

/archive/html/autoconf/2009-04/msg00038.html (6,950 bytes)

190. Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK (score: 18)

Author: Thomas Moulard <thomas.moulard@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:00:34 +0200

Yes, thanks. I see. About the "which" issue, Valgrind does not need an absolute path, it is just that I used to rely on the fact that my binaries are always in my PATH. Using atconfig values (ie: abs

/archive/html/autoconf/2009-04/msg00037.html (7,280 bytes)

191. Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK (score: 18)

Author: Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>

Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:49:53 -0600

According to Thomas Moulard on 4/12/2009 8:01 PM: Missing a close @? Here, the "" are redundant since @EXEEXT@ will never expand to multiple shell words. Unfortunately, AT_TESTED treats its arguments

/archive/html/autoconf/2009-04/msg00036.html (7,055 bytes)

192. Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK (score: 18)

Author: Thomas Moulard <thomas.moulard@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 04:01:57 +0200

Thanks, it is working. I just had to use "which" to force an absolute path as Valgrind does not search in the PATH for the binary it has to run: AT_CHECK([$CHECK_PREFIX `which simple-test`], [0], [ex

/archive/html/autoconf/2009-04/msg00032.html (6,837 bytes)

193. Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK (score: 17)

Author: Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>

Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:47:32 -0600

According to Mike Frysinger on 4/13/2009 4:40 AM: Except that the point of the question was to be able to use the same testsuite in both 'make check' (uninstalled) and 'make installcheck', where the

/archive/html/autoconf/2009-04/msg00035.html (6,935 bytes)

194. Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK (score: 17)

Author: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>

Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:40:18 -0400

nor is it guaranteed to act sanely (stdout/stderr/exit status) better to push the check to configure and AC_PATH_PROG() -mike Attachment: signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

/archive/html/autoconf/2009-04/msg00034.html (7,060 bytes)

195. Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK (score: 17)

Author: Thomas Dickey <dickey@his.com>

Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:03:05 -0400 (EDT)

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote: This is very doable.  In fact, it is how the m4 testsuite allows the user to specify an alternate $SED program [1].  You can use

/archive/html/autoconf/2009-04/msg00033.html (6,702 bytes)

196. Re: [Autotest] Prefixing commands launched by AT_CHECK (score: 17)

Author: Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>

Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 05:21:52 -0600

According to Thomas Moulard on 4/11/2009 5:14 AM: This is very doable. In fact, it is how the m4 testsuite allows the user to specify an alternate $SED program [1]. You can use atlocal.in to perform

/archive/html/autoconf/2009-04/msg00031.html (6,650 bytes)

197. Autoconf 2.52g is released (score: 17)

Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>

Date: 25 Jan 2002 12:48:15 +0100

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gnu.utils.bug as well. Of course there are still many things that ought to be done in Autoconf, nevertheless, there is n

/archive/html/autoconf/2002-01/msg00170.html (27,531 bytes)

198. RFC: Autom4te: defining M4 sets (score: 13)

Author: akim@lrde.epita.fr

Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:22:56 +0200

There are still problems to solve with Autom4te (considered as a package with a set of M4 files, hence the capitalization). One of them is that I don't know how to extend it properly to M4 libraries.

/archive/html/autoconf/2001-08/msg00150.html (10,245 bytes)

199. autoconf-2.65 has 252 test failures on OpenSolaris x86 (score: 12)

Author: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@onetel.net>

Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:46:52 +0000

I've got a Sun Ultra 27 running OpenSolaris (06/2009 release). This is a quad core 3.33 GHz Xeon machine - not a SPARC. I built GNU m4 version 1.4.13, which passed all the tests. Perl v5.8.4 comes as

/archive/html/autoconf/2009-11/msg00101.html (34,765 bytes)

200. Re: verbose testsuite output contains 1M newlines (score: 12)

Author: Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>

Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:47:26 -0600

According to Eric Blake on 4/14/2009 7:17 PM: Here's what I added to the series before pushing. I don't really know how to parse that diff gave reasonable output, as $at_diff may or may not be using

/archive/html/autoconf/2009-04/msg00054.html (9,326 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu v2.0.21