autoconf archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ autotest: 443 ]

Total 443 documents matching your query.

381. Re: Next release? (score: 2)
Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:20:02 +0100
Derek> to have CVS depend on an unreleased Autoconf but I really want to use Derek> the Autotest changes I've been making. Is the Autoconf release Derek> process documented anywhere? Not really, par
/archive/html/autoconf/2003-03/msg00181.html (4,499 bytes)

382. Next release? (score: 2)
Author: Derek Robert Price <derek@ximbiot.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 23:52:12 -0500
Any talk of when the next release of Autoconf will be? I'm reluctant to have CVS depend on an unreleased Autoconf but I really want to use the Autotest changes I've been making. Is the Autoconf relea
/archive/html/autoconf/2003-03/msg00178.html (4,916 bytes)

383. Re: Autoconf 2.56 is released (score: 2)
Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:55:06 +0100
Pavel> Congratulations! Thanks :) Pavel> You probably mean conversion, not conversation :-) Actually there are several mistakes. They are fixed in the current version of the annoucement ;) Subject:
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-11/msg00071.html (10,639 bytes)

384. Autoconf 2.56 is released (score: 2)
Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:57:03 +0100
The Autoconf team -- Akim, Alexandre, Jim, Paul, and Tom -- is happy to annonce the birth of Autoconf 2.56, aka 2.55 with a packaging problem fixed. - Why should I upgrade from 2.54? A few bug fixes,
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-11/msg00058.html (9,744 bytes)

385. Autoconf 2.55 is released! (score: 2)
Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 20:13:34 +0100
The Autoconf team -- Akim, Alexandre, Jim, Paul, and Tom -- is happy to annonce the birth of Autoconf 2.55. Download, compile, install, torture, and enjoy! - Why should I upgrade from 2.54? A few bug
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-11/msg00055.html (8,993 bytes)

386. Autoconf 2.54b released (score: 2)
Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Date: 28 Oct 2002 11:47:58 +0100
The Autoconf team -- Akim, Alexandre, Jim, Paul, and Tom -- is happy to annonce the second beta of forthcoming Autoconf 2.55. Download, compile, install, torture, and enjoy! - Why should I upgrade fr
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-10/msg00193.html (12,653 bytes)

387. Sorry RE: Autoconf 2.53c (score: 2)
Author: "Sam Liddicott" <sam.liddicott@orange.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:13:28 +0100
Sorry. Sam
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-09/msg00081.html (20,750 bytes)

388. RE: Autoconf 2.53c (score: 2)
Author: "Sam Liddicott" <sam.liddicott@orange.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:10:34 +0100
[I've Cut down replies] does this include a fix for the bug where generated sed fragments are too large for solaris packaged sed? I'm "reporting" this bug second hand as occuring with autoconf 2.53,
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-09/msg00080.html (20,561 bytes)

389. Re: AT_CONFIG (score: 2)
Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Date: 09 Sep 2002 18:23:14 +0200
Thanks, I'm applying this: Index: ChangeLog from Akim Demaille <address@hidden> * doc/autoconf.texi (Making testsuite Scripts): Update. Suggested by Nishio Futoshi. Index: doc/autoconf.texi == RCS f
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-09/msg00078.html (6,749 bytes)

390. Autoconf 2.53c (score: 2)
Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Date: 03 Sep 2002 09:30:23 +0200
Autoconf 2.54 is about to be released. This version includes many bugs fixes, and several new features, listed below. Special attention was paid to Automake 1.7-Autoconf 2.54 interaction. Akim, Alexa
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-09/msg00019.html (16,211 bytes)

391. Re: converting netkit to autoconf? (score: 2)
Author: Paul Eggert <eggert@twinsun.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
You say poTAYto, I say poTAHto. Not sure what you're referring to here. The latest Autoconf has documentation for the autotest stuff, if that's what you're talking about. It's in config.status. Admi
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-08/msg00050.html (7,020 bytes)

392. Re: AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG (score: 2)
Author: Paul Eggert <eggert@twinsun.com>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 22:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
This merely means that the test case was always broken, and the new functions.m4 detects the brokennness whereas the old functions.m4 did not. You should be able to use an empty file to do it. I can
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-05/msg00054.html (21,475 bytes)

393. Re: 2.53a m4sh.at:74 failure (score: 2)
Author: Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:10:17 +0100
It seems to do the same as before.. Patrick % gmake testsuite ./autom4te --language=autotest -I . suite.at -o testsuite.tmp mv testsuite.tmp testsuite % ./testsuite -k lineno 15: m4sh.at:29 FAILED ne
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-04/msg00151.html (6,957 bytes)

394. Re: 2.53a m4sh.at:74 failure (score: 2)
Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Date: 18 Apr 2002 17:40:25 +0200
Heck, it is right! How come I did not see that failure :( Try this one. Attachment: diffs.patch Description: Text Data
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-04/msg00149.html (6,216 bytes)

395. Re: 2.53a m4sh.at:74 failure (score: 2)
Author: Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:26:33 +0100
No luck: % cd tests % gmake testsuite ./autom4te --language=autotest -I . suite.at -o testsuite.tmp testsuite.tmp:2812: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_ERROR gmake: ** [testsuite] Error 1 Cheers,
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-04/msg00146.html (5,813 bytes)

396. Re: 2.53 doesn't work on MacOS X (score: 2)
Author: David Thompson <dthompsn@cs.umt.edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:46:01 -0700
Output from make check (I tried to send the whole thing but the list rejected it. If there is someplace to send the whole check, let me know): [localhost:~/src/autoconf-2.53] dthompsn% make check Mak
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-04/msg00041.html (13,885 bytes)

397. Re: AC_CHECK_TYPE search locations (score: 2)
Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Date: 13 Mar 2002 11:05:58 +0100
Paul, I'm applying this patch. Feel free to change directly whatever you want if something needs to be changed. Index: ChangeLog from Akim Demaille <address@hidden> * doc/autoconf.texi (Header Portab
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-03/msg00072.html (6,434 bytes)

398. Re: AC_CONFIG_COMMANDS does not handle an empty second argument. (score: 2)
Author: Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
Date: 06 Feb 2002 18:51:34 +0100
Thanks, I'm applying the following patch. I'd like to know what shell you used to document this. None of the shells I tried (zsh, bash, ash) exhibit such a problem. It's funny to note CONFIG_COMMAND
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-02/msg00059.html (9,080 bytes)

399. Re: AC_INIT translates PACKAGE to lower case (score: 2)
Author: Ralf Corsepius <corsepiu@faw.uni-ulm.de>
Date: 31 Jan 2002 17:50:41 +0100
Am Don, 2002-01-31 um 17.25 schrieb Alexandre Duret-Lutz: I know ... This syntax also doesn't expose the "lowercasing" behavior AFAIU, automake overrides autoconf's PACKAGE and PACKAGE_TARNAME, but d
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-01/msg00239.html (8,049 bytes)

400. Re: AC_INIT translates PACKAGE to lower case (score: 2)
Author: Alexandre Duret-Lutz <duret_g@lrde.epita.fr>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:25:05 +0100
[...] Ralf> Example: Ralf> Given an autoconf-2.52 and automake-1.5 compatible configure.in: Ralf> .. Ralf> AC_INIT Ralf> .. Ralf> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(libXrc, 0.1) Ralf> .. To be fair: this syntax is de
/archive/html/autoconf/2002-01/msg00235.html (7,690 bytes)

Current List: 381 - 400
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]

This search system is powered by Namazu v2.0.21

sysadmin@gnu.org