Robert-Jan Veldhuizen <address@hidden> wrote on 28/06/2009 23:39:32: get That's the explanation I gave to Misja, written in a much more understandable manner :) Christian has since explained the mean
I understand now. So we need to find out a. How good or bad is the race net under those conditions. b. Assuming it is not good enough, can it be improved, either by a better net or some use of the O
Only for the one-sided databases. For the two-sided databases the structure is straightforward: (1) a header with some information about the database (number of chequers, number of points, etc) (2) b
I am wondering if gnubg can read more than two double sided bearoff databases into its evaluation engine. If it is able to do so what must I call that database or do I have to alter the code and add
I should point out, you can tell what databases are being used while GNUBG is running (if you are unsure). This is on Help menu/About/Evaluation Engine button. A typical default installation shows: *
Hi Joachim, I'm finding your article very stimulating. Thanks for putting in the hard work. I'm still thinking about it, but there are a few things I'd like to discuss already. 1 EPC Count 1.1 Why d
No problem. As an interesting side note I was actually in doubt how to handle gammons in the one sided database. When the database is generated the best moves are found by selecting the move with the
hmm, I get: 26/36 + 10/36 * 2/36 = 956/1296 = 73.7654321% gammons Which is the same as the database. Did you notice that 2-1 loses gammon for O? Jørn Attachment: pgp2RtqlY_6ho.pgp Description: PGP s
Win XP No-panels build, 030923 (1.1395) (Problem also occurs in older versions of gnubg) GNU Backgammon Position ID: +L4PAAAGAAAAAA Match ID : cAkAAAAAAAAA +24-23-22-21-20-19--18-17-16-15-14-13-+ O:
Hmm. On my home machine, I get the above sensible results. The odd ones come from a copy installed at work. I'm wondering if my bearoffdatabase or weights file is corrupt in some way. I had a copy b
* Achim Mueller I've built the 6x10 and 6x11 databases (489MB & 1.1GB, respectively). Not that I can remember. You'll need enough disk space, and have the computer running for a while (the 6x11 datab
Hi all! GNU Backgammon Position ID: NwAAwDMAAAAAAA Match ID : UQkAAAAAAAAA +24-23-22-21-20-19--18-17-16-15-14-13-+ O: GNU Backgammon OO | O O | | | 0 points OO | O O | | | OO | O | | | OO | | | | OO
I've now had a change to check, and I *can't* reproduce this error in the newest version. I fixed a bug Dec 4: Wed Dec 4 20:59:50 2002 Jørn Thyssen <address@hidden> * eval.c (EvaluatePositionCubeful
In the attached match, game 1, in move 22 with me having the following position: 1 checker on my 1 pt 3 checkers on my 2 pt 1 chcker on my 5 pt I rolled 43. I, of course, moved 5/1 2/off, leaving me
`getBearoffGammonProbs' `getBearoffGammonProbs' You should add bearoffgammon.c and bearoffgammon.o to the Makefile SOURCE = analysis.c bearoffgammon.c copying.c credits.c database.c dice.c \ drawboa