bug-gnubg archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ bearoff: 835 ] [ database: 1320 ]

Total 438 documents matching your query.

21. [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff Database error (score: 282)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:21:11 -0500
I'm getting a strange error when running a database query. OS Bearoff Database: Invalid Argument aargh! I've only seen this error when running gnubg-no-gui over a mapped drive on a network. There are
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2005-01/msg00022.html (4,458 bytes)

22. [Bug-gnubg] Re: Race database and bearoff DB (score: 282)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 05:00:29 +1200
Again, this is not entirely new. The suggestion to enhance the race DB is based on the assumption that the bot misplays those positions. I would like to see the evidence for that. I think I will star
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-09/msg00291.html (6,753 bytes)

23. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Two sided bearoff database (score: 281)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:21:38 -0600
Problems: - Backwards Compatibility (To previous formats - Non issue imho) - the databases will only work on newer builds. - If we use a single file format (that is all 64 bit offsets) then we waste
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2006-04/msg00133.html (5,684 bytes)

24. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff database (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:41:26 +0100
Really strange! I have built a one sided database using GMP with fractions with my own piece of code. Since I use fractions from GMP there should be no rounding error. Here are my numbers for positio
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2017-01/msg00009.html (7,241 bytes)

25. [Bug-gnubg] Hugh Sconyers full 15x15 Bearoff database support (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:53:19 -0500
Hi, I am wondering if gnubg still has support for the Hugh Sconyers full 15x15 Bearoff database and if it can use it if it is on my hard drive. I haven't got the database yet since I don't know if it
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-07/msg00006.html (4,380 bytes)

26. Re: [Bug-gnubg] bearoff database (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:52:57 +0100
OK, I'll release my tool: http://www.gnubg.org/media/boa.tar.gz The tar file contains source code and executable for windows. It reads a file gnubg_os0.bd for each instance. The database file must be
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-02/msg00082.html (7,504 bytes)

27. RE: [Bug-gnubg] bearoff database (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:13:24 -0500
The databases are downloadable from www.gnubg.org. However, if you want to make your own, there are instructions here. http://www.gnu.org/software/gnubg/manual/gnubg.html#Obtaining-bearoff-databases
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-02/msg00075.html (6,382 bytes)

28. [Bug-gnubg] bearoff database (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:56:09 +0330
hi, i can't, or better said,i don't know how to produce a bearoff database using makebearoff.exe! when i run it i just see a command prompt along with some kind of a help screen describing the option
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-02/msg00074.html (5,548 bytes)

29. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Using Exact Bearoff Database (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 23:36:11 +0100
Spend the money you saved using gnubg instead of Snowie, buy a copy of vmware and you can run Windows 95/98/2K (don't know about XP) from within Linux. And that lovely blue screen just means you clos
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00617.html (6,016 bytes)

30. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Using Exact Bearoff Database (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:45:25 +0000
I've added some code for reading databases from ExactBearoff but I never tested it[*], so unless you want to be a guinea pig, I suggest you wait until I've tested it. Also, it requires you to rename/
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00596.html (5,371 bytes)

31. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Using Exact Bearoff Database (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:49:33 +0100
Analysis / Evaluation Engine (bottom option) shows the used ones. * in memory are gnubg_ts0.bd and gnubg_os0.bd * on disk are gnubg_ts.bd and gnubg_os.bd (and gives details about what dbs are on your
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00581.html (5,378 bytes)

32. [Bug-gnubg] Using Exact Bearoff Database (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 11:24:35 EST
A couple of questions. How can I tell if GNU is using the 2 sided (6 checkers for each player) database. If I set up a simple position and select "Hint" there is no mention there. It just says cubele
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00579.html (4,789 bytes)

33. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff database MD5 checksums (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 11:07:37 +0100
do checksums, though. This is a MD5 Win32 program: http://www.fourmilab.ch/md5/ Simple one, freeware, runs in DOS shell usage: md5 {filename} Nardy
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00501.html (6,480 bytes)

34. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff database MD5 checksums (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 22:26:27 +0100
`44b6040b49b46cb9dd2ce8caa947044d' Well: I did. But WinME here, and makebearoff 1.21 (Dec 19th). md5 gnubg_os0.bd: 3DC7B833C4670849CEE00479A9E21B49 md5 gnubg_ts0.bd: 44B6040B49B46CB9DD2CE8CAA947044D
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00478.html (7,739 bytes)

35. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff database MD5 checksums (score: 278)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 13:48:26 +0100
Nardy's URL I generated gnubg_ts0.bd again. This is the MD5 checksum now: 44B6040B49B46CB9DD2CE8CAA947044D makebearoff 1.21 commandline: makebearoff -t 6x6 -f gnubg_ts0.bd display: Two-sided databas
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00462.html (6,766 bytes)

36. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Race database and bearoff DB (score: 277)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 06:29:14 -0400
Quoting Jim Segrave <address@hidden>: No, 3111 can fail to be off in 2 rolls, even though there are 4 checkers and the pip count is 6. I don't know what the exact criterion should be, but maybe it wo
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00057.html (13,572 bytes)

37. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Race database and bearoff DB (score: 277)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:38:19 +0200
The advantages of working for an ISP: I can easily arrange hosting of something like a 300Mb database on my employer's public ftp server - ftp.demon.nl. If bandwidth is an issue for other things, I c
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00002.html (9,286 bytes)

38. Re: Error while generating bearoff database (score: 274)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:34:34 +0200
Is it really that bad ? I thought that, as long as one does not use shortcuts like the --no-gammons and --normal-dist options, one-sided databases were very accurate. Is it because the probabilites
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2020-10/msg00011.html (7,574 bytes)

39. Error while generating bearoff database (score: 274)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 01:55:51 -0300
Hi all! When trying to generate a one-sided bearoff database greater than 13 points I get the following error. Do you know if there is any workaround? Thanks in advance image.png
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2020-10/msg00000.html (3,608 bytes)

40. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff database (score: 274)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 23:26:30 +0100 (CET)
I tried to recreate the bearoff database and noticed some differences which could be due to rounding, but already at position #47 there were some significant differences. My workings for position 47
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2017-01/msg00008.html (5,597 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu