bug-gnubg archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ bearoff: 835 ] [ database: 1320 ]

Total 438 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Severe side effects of makebearoff (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 16:18:14 +0100
No, this is not caused by make. I've run makebearoff/1 manually from a DOS box. It returns, but keeps running. Really. Regards, Holger
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-11/msg00270.html (7,336 bytes)

342. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Windows file association (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:43:59 +0100
It's important that the registry key(s) have the right values. Especially [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\GNUBackgammon\shell\open\command] needs to be paid special attention to as it contains the command that st
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-11/msg00266.html (7,043 bytes)

343. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Severe side effects of makebearoff (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:09:18 +0100
Your make is starting parallel processes. That's not wrong, but in this case it can have the effect you've seen. Something like this should fix it: @rm -f temp.bd makebearoff -o -s 7999999 > temp.bd
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-11/msg00262.html (7,692 bytes)

344. [Bug-gnubg] Severe side effects of makebearoff (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:56:15 +0100
Hi, There is a severe problem with makebearoff under Windows that probably causes wrong creations of the bearoff database. When started it returns after about a second (depending on the computer spee
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-11/msg00260.html (7,275 bytes)

345. RE: [Bug-gnubg] Windows file association (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:56:51 +0100
I think we rather should make a sgf laucher program. A program that looks at the sgf file and finds out whenever this is a Go file or Backgammon file or whatever file. Then the program can launch th
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-11/msg00259.html (6,359 bytes)

346. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Windows file association (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:30:44 +0100
The file associations do work for me... but the bearoff database and weights are in the Installed Dir (C:\Program Files\gnubg here). So GNU Backgammon starts generating a bearoff DB and can't find t
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-11/msg00257.html (5,611 bytes)

347. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Compile latest version under Windows (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 17:29:02 +0100
Yeah, it seems that I got it working (onechequer.c/.o was missing, too). Though, there are still circular dependencies with my Makefile. Can they be avoided? During the last try br1.c had about the s
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-11/msg00243.html (9,217 bytes)

348. Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg.bd (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 07:30:24 +1300
Yes, I store the distribution for taking one or more chequers off which can be used for gammon probabilities. There is a place for saving here as well - I guess in most of those positions the probab
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-11/msg00035.html (7,376 bytes)

349. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Training neural nets: How does size matter? (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:22:23 -0400
Quoting Øystein O Johansen <address@hidden>: Yes, but of course I might not answer them all. I'm happy to help the gnu effort, particularly since I don't want you to be beaten badly by Snowie 4. How
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-08/msg00304.html (15,252 bytes)

350. Re: GNU Backgammon Clones (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:31:54 +0200
Hi Jeurgen,   The techniques for creating a strong backgammon program are well known, and any strong bot is going to make the same move as another strong bot, simply because it is the correct move.
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2021-06/msg00002.html (23,395 bytes)

351. RE: GNU Backgammon Clones (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 08:45:47 +0000
Hi Jeurgen, The techniques for creating a strong backgammon program are well known, and any strong bot is going to make the same move as another strong bot, simply because it is the correct move. The
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2021-06/msg00001.html (23,518 bytes)

352. GNU Backgammon Clones (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 23:35:16 +0200
Hi ! GNU Backgammon Clones It's a very "sensitive theme" and a difficult problem: cloning. Is it possible to track down, to prove that a certain program is a clone of GNU Backgammon ? Since about 20
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2021-06/msg00000.html (9,880 bytes)

353. makebearoff -t 6x15 doesn't work for me (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 01:38:51 +0100
Hi, I tried to create a large two-sided bearoff database with: $ makebearoff -t 6x15 -f gnubg_ts.bd The program told me that the "total number of positions" is -1350385600, which seemed dubious to me
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2020-01/msg00000.html (4,226 bytes)

354. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Huge evaluation difference (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 14:59:47 +0100
It looks like the one-sided bearoff database is accurate to at leat 3 digits :-).
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2019-03/msg00008.html (6,999 bytes)

355. [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.06.002 released (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 20:51:49 +0200
I have generated a new source tar ball that is available at: http://files.gnubg.org/media/sources/gnubg-release-1.06.002-sources.tar.gz A MS Windows installer can be found here at: http://files.gnubg
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2018-08/msg00000.html (5,450 bytes)

356. Re: [Bug-gnubg] wasting time when a win is certain (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 08:52:45 +0000
I must be half asleep. It would have consulted the bearoff database and realized the equities either way guarantee the win so it chose whatever it saw as the first candidate. I guess the moves could
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2014-08/msg00003.html (6,664 bytes)

357. Re: [Bug-gnubg] wasting time when a win is certain (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 23:51:46 -0600
I must be half asleep. It would have consulted the bearoff database and realized the equities either way guarantee the win so it chose whatever it saw as the first candidate. I guess the moves could
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2014-08/msg00002.html (5,780 bytes)

358. Re: [Bug-gnubg] wasting time when a win is certain (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 23:29:18 -0600
What is going on is that both plays one off or 2 off still guarantee victory. The bot sees that it has a choice between 2 moves which guarantees a win. It happens to be that at the time of the analys
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2014-08/msg00001.html (5,928 bytes)

359. [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG Release 1.03.000 next Sunday Aug 3rd. (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 20:21:21 -0600
Howdy All, I will be building the next release of GNUbg (1.03.000) next Sunday evening. So any changes that one may have should be put in as soon as possible so testing can occur. I will be completin
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2014-07/msg00024.html (14,653 bytes)

360. [Bug-gnubg] Bug in PositionBearoff() and PositionIndex() (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:46 +0200 (CEST)
I think there is something wrong (but harmless with the compilers we've used) in these functions from positionid.c. In PositionBearoff() for instance : for( j = nPoints - 1, i = 0; i < nPoints; i++ )
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-04/msg00007.html (5,940 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu