bug-gnubg archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ bearoff: 835 ] [ database: 1320 ]

Total 438 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Race database and bearoff DB (score: 269)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 17:23:54 +0200
I can easily say that a continuous 1Mb/s 24x7x365 of download wouldn't really be an issue at all. Obviously there would be peaks, but we're talking about having no issues with 30Gb/day. That's 100 co
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00010.html (7,028 bytes)

62. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Race database and bearoff DB (score: 269)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:23:56 +0200
At those sorts of numbers, we'd never notice the bandwidth if people were downloading a rolloff db. -- Jim Segrave address@hidden
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00004.html (8,720 bytes)

63. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Race database and bearoff DB (score: 269)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:06:24 +0000
Sounds fine with me. Maybe we'll be able to put it on alpha.gnu.org or ftp.gnu.org as well. I'll play on, and make the extended OS DB work. The makebearoff program may have to be optimised as it requ
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00003.html (8,235 bytes)

64. Re: Error while generating bearoff database (score: 265)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 22:50:27 +0200
A possible plan could be to use POSIX off_t type and fseeko(), check that it still gives the same results as now, possibly after a few fixes, then try a #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64, check that it gi
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2020-10/msg00009.html (6,467 bytes)

65. Re: [Bug-gnubg] bearoff database (score: 265)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:22:56 +0100
Likely you will need to put it all in your gnubg folder and run the program from there. The gnubg .bat file might help you with the setup if you need to run it from another location, but I haven't ch
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-02/msg00088.html (6,182 bytes)

66. Re: [Bug-gnubg] bearoff database (score: 265)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:32:01 +0330
hi again, well, in terms of input and output, what i want is to put in the positions of the two players and get out the winning probability for the player on roll. a typical line of the ascii file i'
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-02/msg00079.html (5,999 bytes)

67. Re: [Bug-gnubg] bearoff database (score: 265)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:50:58 +0100
It is not too clear what you are trying to achieve. Could you try to explain it in terms of input and output. What would a typical line of the text file ideally look like. Christian.
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-02/msg00078.html (6,376 bytes)

68. Re: [Bug-gnubg] bearoff database (score: 265)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:32:54 +0330
hi, ok guys i downloaded Version 0.90-mingw (build Feb 4 2009) and am able to run makebearoff from the command prompt of windows now. but i do not understand how bearoffdump works. it has (or takes)
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-02/msg00077.html (5,915 bytes)

69. Re: [Bug-gnubg] bearoff database (score: 265)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:52:30 +0100
Pretty much what Ian said, just adding that there is a bearoffdump utility. I believe it is included with windows too. bearoffdump and makebearoff should be run through the windows command prompt, av
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-02/msg00076.html (6,077 bytes)

70. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Using Exact Bearoff Database (score: 265)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:04:20 +0100
* Jim Segrave VMWare runs XP fine here. I'm using it to play on GG with my laptop. :) http://www.vmware.com should probably answer most other questions. Morten! -- "...a liquid which was almost, but
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00621.html (5,269 bytes)

71. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff database MD5 checksums (score: 265)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 21:14:10 +0100
False alarm. :-( I'm sorry. Cygwin's md5sum operates in text mode for default. One needs to specify -b for binary mode, and then I do get the same checksums. Sorry to have caused confusion. Regards,
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00492.html (6,480 bytes)

72. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff database MD5 checksums (score: 265)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 12:59:44 +0000
[snip] Yup, that looks fine! Jørn
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00464.html (6,338 bytes)

73. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Race database and bearoff DB (score: 265)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:50:27 +0000
It's hard to determine from IP numbers/DNS addresses as people with dialup or DSL access may have dynamic IP addresses. Do you know how many times gnubg-xx.exe is downloaded? Yes, perhaps it's more t
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00008.html (6,887 bytes)

74. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Race database and bearoff DB (score: 265)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:37:43 +0200
If it makes thing easier to guess: I have about 700 hits at my page each week, usually from about 500 different computers. I guess Jørns figure is quite good, but I would acctually guess it's close
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00007.html (6,699 bytes)

75. [Bug-gnubg] large one-sided bearoff db (score: 218)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 07:53:40 +0000
Hi all, I've checked-in an initial implementation of large one-sided bearoff databases. The file sizes are twice as large as I've reported earlier, since I store 32 short ints for bearing off all che
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00070.html (6,378 bytes)

76. Re: [Bug-Gnubg] Bearoff Databases...Does GNUbg see both 1-sided and2-sided? (score: 214)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 12:08:20 +0100
This is what I get from that build: * On disk 1-sided bearoff database evaluator: - generated by GNU Backgammon - up to 15 chequers on 10 points (3268760 positions) per player - database includes gam
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00275.html (8,046 bytes)

77. Re: [Bug-gnubg] more than 2 double sided bearoff databases (score: 211)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:56:36 +0000
Hi Michael, Gnubg can have two databases of each type. One is loaded into memory; the other is held on disk and only accessed when required. This allows gnubg to have a small database in memory, say
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-09/msg00006.html (7,393 bytes)

78. Re: [Bug-gnubg] experimental support for Hugh Sconyers' full 15x15 bearoff (score: 210)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 06:55:31 -0700
While I don't know anything about this database, it sounds very interesting. I do have some interest in offering gnubg-assisted game analysis as a web-based service. If a 50GB database helps, then th
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2003-07/msg00169.html (8,156 bytes)

79. [Bug-gnubg] An exact bearoff analyser! (score: 206)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:08:10 +0200
An exact bearoff analysing tool. -- - Have you ever lost a position that was "impossible" to lose? - Do you always feel unlucky in the bearoff? - Have you ever told your hard luck story: "It was a No
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-06/msg00007.html (8,366 bytes)

80. [Bug-gnubg] experimental support for Hugh Sconyers' full 15x15 bearoff (score: 202)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:38:59 +0000
Hi all, I've added support for Hugh Sconyer's full 15x15 bearoff database in gnubg. There are still a few glitches, so I consider this feature experimental. One of them is that you need to issue the
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2003-07/msg00164.html (6,954 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu