On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 05:21:17PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: Downloads, installs and runs fine. convert-ly seems fine too
I was confused because Joseph keeps on talking about wanting to copy "code" from the documentation, and Trevor Daniels recently said "you know what? you guys are nutters. Do whatever you want with my
Le samedi 19 septembre 2009 à 18:34 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : Bloody mao, we're talking about the autor of cary.ly :-) Sure, so right now isn't convenient either to remove cary.ly and other
Or, since I don't give a rotten fig about this issue, I could just tell Trevor how he can continue to investigate. I currently have 34 emails which I consider too urgent to even move into my top-prio
Le dimanche 13 septembre 2009 à 09:44 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : This is bloody ridiculous. Instead of testing it this way as if lilypond-book was a black box, you could either use your memor
True... at least, unless we want to directly link with GPL v3 code (GPLv2 and GPLv3 are incompatible). AFAIK we don't do this, so that's not a concern. Hmm, the new 10.5 GUI includes python... eh?!?
Op maandag 29-06-2009 om 22:55 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen Nienhuys: +1. We need more nice, appropriete graphical [if possible colourful] content. Much more, not less. Esp the download page
2009/6/29 Graham Percival <address@hidden>: I agree. It does not worth the headache. Maybe later... on next life. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org
Thanks for looking into all this. I must admit that I checked the info the FreeBSD Security Officer gave me, and he was wrong: using the official freebsd logo requires that the image links to freebsd
Op donderdag 25-06-2009 om 16:43 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham Percival: Sure, I was talking about *previous* incarnations of GUB ignoring many *errors* even. I'm not sure where this error/war
I'm still not convinced that messages like -- cat: downloads/lilypond/git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git//refs/heads/git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git/master: No such file or directory -- are worth keeping; surel
What you do about it is use your own best judgement and get the bloody thing finished. OBVIOUSLY Mats is completely incompetent, so ignore anything he sent you and take Jonathan's complete tarball. A
Valentin Villenave wrote: 2009/5/21 Graham Percival <address@hidden>: Jon Kulp has updated all the snippets for 2.12. They are ready to go whenever Sebastiano is ready to go. I think Seba is ready. I
2009/5/21 Graham Percival <address@hidden>: I think Seba is ready. OK. Jon, do you have a tarball of updated snippets? if so, please send it privately or upload it somewhere where I (or Seba) can ret
You are NOT allowed to "bump" this. We know about the bugs. Nobody is submitting patches to solve them. What should we do? Wave a magic wand that fixes bug? Believe me, if I had such a magic wand, I'
Umm. Yet another web interface? We could compile everything in the tarball and check for any error messsages; that would identify any problem ones. Yes. Just in case there's any doubt: - Valentin is
Well, we ran out of volunteer time during GDP. Ralph has been adding more entries after that, and I think he's almost finished NR 1. So... it'll probably be about six months until he gets to NR 3. Of