lilypond-devel archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ flags,: 139 ] [ beams: 1381 ] [ stem: 2275 ] [ length: 2309 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 862)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:45:43 +0100
Hi all, There is a problem with LilyPond default output that i want to discuss. Look at the attachment1: - in the first line: the stems of the b's are too short, - in the second and third line: the b
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00639.html (8,481 bytes)

2. RE: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 840)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:02:18 +0000
Janek, Hi all, There is a problem with LilyPond default output that i want to discuss. Look at the attachment1: - in the first line: the stems of the b's are too short, -- See http://lists.gnu.org/ar
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00640.html (6,868 bytes)

3. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 815)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:53:45 +0100
W dniu 27 grudnia 2010 14:02 użytkownik James Lowe <address@hidden> napisał: Yes. It was agreed back then that the current behaviour should be improved and nothing has been done yet (if this issue
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00641.html (7,639 bytes)

4. RE: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 840)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:02:23 +0000
Janek, ________________________________ From: Janek Warchoł address@hidden Sent: 27 December 2010 13:53 To: James Lowe Cc: address@hidden Subject: Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directio
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00642.html (8,188 bytes)

5. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 815)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:17:47 -0700
On 12/27/10 6:53 AM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote: Janek, I appreciate your work. And I appreciate your raising the issue. I think it's very helpful to have discussions that identify the i
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00643.html (10,695 bytes)

6. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 815)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:21:11 +0100
2010/12/27 James Lowe <address@hidden>: Ok. That's a relief. And thank you for that link! So what do you think about scaling flags? ;) Janek
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00644.html (7,816 bytes)

7. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 815)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:38:28 +0100
2010/12/27 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>: That's exactly what i expect! I'll try to solve it, as hard as i can. (The only thing that worries me is that my programming skills are not high... i only h
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00646.html (8,728 bytes)

8. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 820)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:49:49 -0700
On 12/27/10 7:38 AM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote: I haven't looked carefully at this issue, so I don't know how hard it will be to solve. But I don't think it's hugely difficult. And the
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00648.html (10,221 bytes)

9. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 835)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:01:44 +0100
2010/12/27 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>: Sounds promising :) Ah, all right. Ah, looks like i haven't made myself clear. The question whether to: - use unchanged flags and lengthen the stem to make
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00650.html (10,462 bytes)

10. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 868)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:32:52 -0700
On 12/27/10 9:01 AM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote: No, that is not my answer. I don't have an answer yet. But my current thought (without yet reviewing my engraving books) is "lengthen the
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00652.html (9,798 bytes)

11. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 847)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:48:09 +0100
2010/12/27 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>: Ok. I'll wait. Thanks, Janek
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00654.html (8,694 bytes)

12. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 847)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:41:27 -0200
2010/12/27 Janek Warchoł <address@hidden>: Why don't you try to find some scans of reputable editions to see what the standard behavior is in this case? IIRC, I never saw different flag shapes withi
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00658.html (8,852 bytes)

13. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 1,044)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:18:13 -0700
On 12/27/10 9:48 AM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote: I have now reviewed the engraving books. I will give the answers that they have. Ross, 1970 edition, p. 127: "The flag is slightly longer
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00659.html (11,357 bytes)

14. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 836)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:28:04 +0100
2010/12/27 Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> Because i believe the situation is quite different. Would it be feasible for an engraver to have different flags for many different stem lengths? No, perh
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00672.html (10,233 bytes)

15. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 846)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:13:15 -0700
On 12/28/10 12:28 PM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote: I'm not opposed to reasoning, but I don't think that the goal of LilyPond is to invent new standards for engraving. Personally, I much p
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00678.html (11,407 bytes)

16. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 856)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 09:23:33 +0100
2010/12/28 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> Maybe. But from what i've heard, there are few things that actually can be called standards. I heards that engraving books don't agree with each other quite
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00697.html (14,171 bytes)

17. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 851)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:55:00 -0700
On 12/29/10 1:23 AM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote: In such a case, there are different standards, and we apply both, with a variable to choose between the different behaviors. That's why w
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00709.html (12,224 bytes)

18. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 928)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:32:50 +0100
2010/12/29 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>: And that's very good indeed! But still one of these behaviours is the default one, and the default one will always be the dominant one. Look: so many people
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00714.html (11,278 bytes)

19. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 940)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 21:33:41 -0700
On 12/29/10 4:32 PM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote: I think I agree, but this rule does not agree with the engraving books. So if we go this way we're breaking new ground. That makes me ner
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00733.html (12,091 bytes)

20. Re: flags, beams and stem length in forced directions - output improvement (score: 815)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 09:22:35 +0100
2010/12/31 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>: Hi! Sorry I'm not a guru of engraving practices, nor a core developer (not even a developer). But I have a general thought, Janek. All the examples you show
/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00736.html (7,701 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu