libtool archive search

Results:

References: [ multilib: 123 ]

Total 123 documents matching your query.

1. Re: multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 35): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:02:59 -0500; Proposed patches for branch-1-5 and HEAD. Okay to apply? Peter 2007-09-05 Peter O'Gorman <address@hidden> * libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER) [linux]: Try to set the dynamic linker search pa; /archive/html/libtool/2007-09/msg00003.html (7,565 bytes)
2. Re: multilib (score: 35): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:57:18 +1100; [ please forgive the webmailer messing up the lines ] I'm not really too knowledgable of the problem space. What are the problems with multilib? Is it just that libtool searches the wrong libdirs? Th; /archive/html/libtool/2005-02/msg00124.html (6,985 bytes)
3. multilib (score: 35): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:17:35 +0900; Hi, I'm not really too knowledgable of the problem space. What are the problems with multilib? Is it just that libtool searches the wrong libdirs? /usr/lib64 should come before /usr/lib? If that is t; /archive/html/libtool/2005-02/msg00116.html (5,550 bytes)
4. Re: libtool, multilib and test "duplicate convenience archive names" (score: 34): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:29:59 +0200; Hi Roumen, Sorry, I don't remember that change anymore and thus cannot help, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger address@hidden,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr.; /archive/html/libtool/2011-10/msg00019.html (7,507 bytes)
5. Re: libtool, multilib and test "duplicate convenience archive names" (score: 34): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:07:13 +0300; Hi Andreas and Bo, Please could you clarify build of 64-bit system for 32 bit. I wonder how to build and test on a 64 bit platform a 32 bit libtool version. First test is to use --build=x86_64-gnu-li; /archive/html/libtool/2011-10/msg00018.html (6,983 bytes)
6. libtool, multilib and test "duplicate convenience archive names" (score: 34): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:55:10 +0300; Hello All, I wonder how to build and test on a 64 bit platform a 32 bit libtool version. First test is to use --build=x86_64-gnu-linux --host=i386-gnu-linux with CC and CXX set to 'gcc|g++ -m32', i.e; /archive/html/libtool/2011-10/msg00017.html (6,310 bytes)
7. Re: multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 34): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:59:45 -0600; Committed these, Thanks, Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com Index: ChangeLog == RCS file: /sources/libtool/libtool/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.1220.2.486 diff -u -r1.1220.2.486 ChangeLog; /archive/html/libtool/2008-01/msg00091.html (9,360 bytes)
8. Re: multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 34): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 00:25:40 +0200; Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 08:02:59AM CEST: Not quite, I'm afraid. First, please put $CPPFLAGS before $LDFLAGS, for consistency. Then, this code is used in each tag -- F; /archive/html/libtool/2007-09/msg00006.html (8,551 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] x86-64 and multilib (score: 34): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:12:00 +0900; [moved from libtool-patches to libtool] Albert, Thank you for looking at the patch, and sorry for taking too long to follow up to your comments. (please see below) AC> You reset sys_lib_dlsearch_path; /archive/html/libtool/2004-04/msg00009.html (8,127 bytes)
10. Re: multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:43:44 +0100; Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 07:29:08PM CET: I suppose, yes, but I guess some mention in the documentation would not be bad. Thank you, Ralf; /archive/html/libtool/2008-01/msg00079.html (4,829 bytes)
11. Re: multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:29:08 -0600; Really old thread, sorry. I give up on trying to find fancy ways to set the paths, ok to apply this to branch-1-5 (and similar for HEAD)? Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com 2008-01-21 Peter O'G; /archive/html/libtool/2008-01/msg00075.html (6,423 bytes)
12. Re: multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:42:53 -0500; Hi Ralf, thank you for testing! which makes me think maybe doing the simple thing: <crap> sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec64='/lib64 /usr/lib64' sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec32='/lib32 /usr/lib32' sys_lib_dls; /archive/html/libtool/2007-09/msg00008.html (5,671 bytes)
13. Re: multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:22:56 -0500; You're right, of course, the regex is not actually necessary, thinko on my part. Peter; /archive/html/libtool/2007-08/msg00049.html (5,020 bytes)
14. Re: multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:59:58 -0400; i'm not sure how this sample output explains the comment that we need to match the first absolute path ? afaik, the only absolute path ive ever seen in $1 is the ld.so as ldd shows: (1) [DT_NEEDED fo; /archive/html/libtool/2007-08/msg00048.html (6,844 bytes)
15. Re: multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:41:16 -0500; Makes sense to me. However, I think we'd need to match the first absolute path output from ldd because: address@hidden ]$ ldd fool linux-gate.so.1 => (0x009be000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00b82; /archive/html/libtool/2007-08/msg00047.html (5,930 bytes)
16. Re: multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 06:40:54 -0400; this test would still be subject to the environment of ldd ... in otherwords, it is still possible to have ldd return /lib/libc.so.6 when /lib is a symlink to /lib64 ... since the dynamic loader is t; /archive/html/libtool/2007-08/msg00046.html (5,417 bytes)
17. Re: multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:07:40 -0500; Here is yet another alternative. Feedback appreciated. Peter Attachment: multilib_dlsearchpath.diff Description: Text Data; /archive/html/libtool/2007-08/msg00044.html (6,001 bytes)
18. multilib dirs and ld.so (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:30:48 -0500; Hi, Albert pointed out to me yesterday that while, with 1.5.24 we now add the correct directories to sys_lib_search_path_spec, they do not get added to sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec, resulting in libtoo; /archive/html/libtool/2007-08/msg00037.html (5,254 bytes)
19. Re: multilib issues when cross-linking (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:50:50 +0100; Hello Christian, * Christian Parpart wrote on Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 02:41:54PM CET: Please try the 1.5.23b beta release due for release sometime this weekend. Cheers, Ralf; /archive/html/libtool/2007-02/msg00013.html (4,407 bytes)
20. multilib issues when cross-linking (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:41:54 +0100; Hi, I'm on amd64, and want to build my package for both, x86 and amd64. so while the latter works just fine, the first does not. On AMD64, NVIDIA provides a /usr/lib{32,64}/libGL.la, but other graphi; /archive/html/libtool/2007-02/msg00012.html (5,466 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]