libtool archive search

101. Re: multilib2 patch (was: another 1.5 release) (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:53:22 -0500 (EST)

If something is specifying -Ltests/tagdemo on the command line, it should fail. This seems to indicate something is adding a -L option that shouldn't have been added. It appears gcc can not be made t

/archive/html/libtool/2004-12/msg00096.html (7,287 bytes)

102. Re: another 1.5 release (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 00:15:55 +0900

Silly question, but does gcc -print-search-dirs print different dirs when 64bit multilib options are specified? Maybe we just need to add CFLAGS etc to the -print-search-dirs test in libtool.m4? The

/archive/html/libtool/2004-12/msg00049.html (7,170 bytes)

103. Re: another 1.5 release (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 09:07:56 -0600 (CST)

The check for GCC is done outside of the scope of the change; all that is checked in the new code is whether -print-file-name works, which will pass for all recent versions of GCC. Silly question, b

/archive/html/libtool/2004-12/msg00048.html (7,565 bytes)

104. Re: another 1.5 release (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 22:42:44 +0900

The check for GCC is done outside of the scope of the change; all that is checked in the new code is whether -print-file-name works, which will pass for all recent versions of GCC. Silly question, b

/archive/html/libtool/2004-12/msg00047.html (7,386 bytes)

105. Re: another 1.5 release (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:03:22 -0600 (CST)

The GCC-specific code operates (and must operate) per libtool invocation, not at configure time. GCC is used to find the files if a) GCC is in use (as determined by configure) and b) the GCC in use s

/archive/html/libtool/2004-12/msg00035.html (8,483 bytes)

106. Re: another 1.5 release (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:20:36 -0500 (EST)

The final cut off was a few months ago, but there was a final final cut off more recently, and an even more final cut off on the sixth (this Monday). The practical final final cut off is the sixteent

/archive/html/libtool/2004-12/msg00031.html (7,834 bytes)

107. Re: another 1.5 release (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:54:49 -0500 (EST)

On 2004-12-03T11:08+0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: ) * Scott James Remnant wrote on Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 10:06:01AM CET: ) > On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 18:36 -0500, Daniel Reed wrote: ) > > Is there any cha

/archive/html/libtool/2004-12/msg00030.html (7,107 bytes)

108. Re: another 1.5 release (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:06:01 +0000

Do you have a copy of the patch to be considered? I suspect it's the one that isn't compatible with the multilib layout chosen by Debian. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange thin

/archive/html/libtool/2004-12/msg00024.html (6,379 bytes)

109. Re: another 1.5 release (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:33:41 +0100

* Daniel Reed wrote on Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:36:24AM CET: Great! How much time do you have left? The general idea looks fine to me. Unless other libtool distro maintainers disagree, I'd like to see

/archive/html/libtool/2004-12/msg00023.html (6,882 bytes)

110. Re: another 1.5 release (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 18:36:24 -0500 (EST)

It's looking like I may be able to get current Libtool into the final RHEL 4 release. Is there any chance .multilib2 can be incorporated into 1.5.12? As written, it simply causes libtool to ask gcc t

/archive/html/libtool/2004-12/msg00020.html (5,873 bytes)

111. Re: TODO (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:33:55 -0800

now perhaps, but in the past? not everyone updates the autotools in their packages as soon as possible. besides, it is arguable that libtool should be fairly well adapted to RedHat by default, the 1.

/archive/html/libtool/2004-11/msg00321.html (10,705 bytes)

112. Re: TODO (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:36:21 -0500 (EST)

Just to address that last comment: Red Hat has shipped patch-free Autoconf since Red Hat Linux 8.0, patch-free Automake since Fedora Core 1, and will hopefully be shipping a patch-free Libtool in Fed

/archive/html/libtool/2004-11/msg00311.html (8,993 bytes)

113. Re: TODO (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:35:14 -0500 (EST)

On 2004-11-14T08:50-0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: ) On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 11:20 +0000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: ) > Haven't thought through the -I thing yet though... maybe that doesn't ) > belong i

/archive/html/libtool/2004-11/msg00265.html (10,976 bytes)

114. Re: TODO (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:27:32 -0800

but does it care about where the package is going to install it's headers? yes yes they serve two distinct purposes. yes, two distinct purposes. huh? how? pkg-config is used to give basic information

/archive/html/libtool/2004-11/msg00255.html (11,403 bytes)

115. Re: TODO (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:06:42 -0600 (CST)

If multilibs should ever be able to support them, I'd expect libtool having to examine the whole command being used, comprising CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS (There exist targets where multilib variants are be

/archive/html/libtool/2004-11/msg00250.html (7,538 bytes)

116. Re: TODO (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:21:19 +0100

Well, current libtool does not support multilibs. If multilibs should ever be able to support them, I'd expect libtool having to examine the whole command being used, comprising CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS (

/archive/html/libtool/2004-11/msg00244.html (9,689 bytes)

117. Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.8 released. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:13:04 -0500 (CDT)

In regard to: Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.8 released., Bob Friesenhahn said (at...: When building a multilibed library, a variant of the library could be built for every possible architectural option, or a s

/archive/html/libtool/2004-08/msg00099.html (6,968 bytes)

118. Re: GNU Libtool 1.5.8 released. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:28:26 +0100

There is precedent for doing it both ways: IRIX 6.2 and later have /usr/lib, /usr/lib32 and /usr/lib64 for the three supported ABIs (O32, N32 and N64 respectively). SuSE also ship biarch systems with

/archive/html/libtool/2004-08/msg00076.html (6,977 bytes)

119. Re: libtool, Apache 2.0, AIX (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:04:48 -0600

Hello, The native AIX way of handling shared libraries is to create a shared object and put it in an archive. I believe that this archive normally includes a shared object, and a static archive, then

/archive/html/libtool/2001-11/msg00101.html (7,803 bytes)

120. Re: MULTI_LIB vs. libtool: who will win (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 11:04:06 -0500

Marc: Bruce Korb is currently looking into adding multilib support to Libtool, and it sounds like you're running into exactly the problems he's hoping to fix. ;) I'm not sure where he is in the proce

/archive/html/libtool/2001-10/msg00005.html (5,514 bytes)