Hi. When it comes to create slur over repeat (volta), I use this trick: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes#modifying-ties-and-slurs (see: Specifying control points
A long-missed feature is now back: as the first part of slur shaping improvements promised by me, i wrote a snippet that allows you to specify how the slur should be attached to the notes. here's the
That seems to work well. Is there another workaround, do you think? Seeing the slur over that far bugs me just the slightest. By the way, is this a bug in Lilypond? I'm currently on 2.16.2 -Ryan McCl
Hi, Urs and Helge Kruse (sorry Helge - don't have your email address) I managed to code cross staff phrasing with \change Staff = "right" or "left" with Helge's sample code. I added other cross staff
Helge, Sorry my previous email don't include your email address. Thank you for your sample "\change Staff = right or left" code. It helps me a lot. Thanks, Ming From: Helge Kruse <address@hidden> To:
From: Jethro Van Thuyne Subject: Slur as TupletBracket Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:55:33 +0000 (UTC) User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) I'm trying to replace the tuplet bracket with a slur by
MusFelix wrote Sunday, April 17, 2011 12:53 AM While adjusting slurs, I have come across cases where the adjustment doesn't take. I have played around with all of the slur details settings, but nothi
Thanks. But that only works when the articulation is on the notehead side, not when it is on the bar side. See this: \version "2.13.51" \include "english.ly" \relative c' { \override Slur #'details #
On 11-02-19 02:45 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Janek Warchoł<address@hidden> writes: Thanks for all replies. I'd use phrasing slur, however there's not much phrase to indicate with it... Look at the s
2011/2/19 David Kastrup <address@hidden>: Maybe, i must ask the composer. Should a dashed slur be used in such a case? However, this piece is for chorus, so i doubt this explanation :P thanks, Janek
Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, August 04, 2009 2:05 PM On 8/4/09 5:35 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" <address@hidden> wrote: Am Dienstag, 4. August 2009 01:29:56 schrieb Trevor Daniels: Stupid of me! I gave
Is this a bug or not? The fingering indications for C and D don't sit just above the noteheads as they do for the other notes. If I remove the slur between those two notes, then the fingering is posi
What if you used \voiceOne in the "hidden" voice instead of the slur length and offset setting? Nick Payne wrote: Well I managed to get an acceptable result with the following: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
following example, it seems that LilyPond already tries to place the slur as much as possible outside the accidentals, compared to if you change the setting. My guess is that there are other constrai
The output for this displays slurs clashing with accidentals. I've seen this kind of collision before - but is there no way to avoid it automatically? I thought avoid-slur would make some difference.
Hello, I got a problem with a slur. In the code below, a slur is supposed to go from bar 3 to the first note in bar 5. When I tried a standard slur, nothing happened, then I tried it with Phrasing Sl
My apologies. I have tried to recall the first version of this message, due to a misstatement. I'm trying (right now) to reproduce only the piano part (i.e., the bottom two staves) in the measure in
Greetings - I'm getting better at this, and LilyPond is becoming more clear all the time. Thank you for your hard work and your help. I still run into difficulties - here's my latest. I'm trying to r
Isn't it that if you specify the avoid-slur property of the Tie object, then slurs will avoid ties (not that ties will avoid scripts as you seem to think)? Note that the avoid-slur property is set on
Sure do miss the "\override Slur #'attachment = " feature in v 2.4.6. Using "\override Slur #'control-points = " as a workaround is tedious. Don't want to upgrade beyond 2.4.6 yet. Is there a better