I'll only bump this once, I promise. Is this a bug, or is the intended behavior that the slur be shaped? -- Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Knute Snortum <address@hidden> w
Hi everyone, I stumbled across a bug where Lilypond generates a bad slur if the slur crosses a line break and there is a simultaneous clef change in a different staff. I found a previous report for t
maybe someone can help me: How can i combine an articulation mark like marcato with a slur in a way where the slur is nearby the note head and the marcato is above the slur in this example. Changing
Bynow you should have realized that Mails to lilypond-user do not, as a rule, get lost and reposting them several times does not help. At any rate, \once \omit Slur will work fine (\once \hide Slur i
Hi David, Thanks for your reply (and your admonition to read more carefully next time(s)). My problem with your advice "You have to use \slurUp at the moment a slur is _started_, not when it already
Hi Harm, Thanks for checking. I had a look at the file I am now porting to 2.19 and it seems it was made with 2.11.57. I attached an image showing how things were back in 2008/9. There the slur ends
Hi, everyone, I'm new to LilyPond, and to the forum here. After trying several different options and looking around the documentation, I can't seem to find a solution to my problem. I'm working on a
It just occurred to me that the following example does a much better job of illustrating this point than the one I previously submitted: \version "2.19.50" \relative c'' { \stemUp \override Slur.pos
Thank you!! FWIW, I've used \repeatTie in situations like this as well: \repeat volta 2 { c4 c4 ( } \alternative { { c4 ) r } { c2 \repeatTie } } Naturally, you can adjust its shape with
I typed that string into google and the top hit was http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes which is the page you've quoted from in this thread. Yes, and if you paid at
Hi Andrew, Of course they can. In the best of all possible worlds, the user would be able [without explicit and individual \shape or #’details overrides] to say something like <pseudocode> \overrid
Hello all, I know that slur coding is difficult, and on the to do list…In the meantime, does anyone have any automated hacks/engraver/code that simplifies the tweaking currently required? In partic
Good. Attaching your example document makes it easy to just add the required changes. Changing staves does not rewind time so you have to apply the rest in parallel. You can relax some constraints. T
How do you position a slur under a beam? Setting Slur.positions does not want to move it, which is fine, but I cannot find the correct override or setting. And in this example, part of a complex mult
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Ralph Palmer <address@hidden> wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Daniel Rosen <address@hidden> Date: Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:24 PM Subject: Apparent bug: Bracketed T
My hymn has a key signature of B Major, so I have to manually sharp all the naturals in the code. On this one syllable - the "cha-" in Eucharist, I need to have the beamed 8th notes span for one syll
Simon, you wrote Sunday, June 14, 2015 12:20 AM Happy to help; sorry for sounding a little irritated. Not really different. This is because dynamics and dynamic spanners are not articulations. "avoid