bug-wget archive search

281. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC, new version (score: 39)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:15:37 +0200

Hi Giuseppe, Thanks for your reply. I've attached a new version of the patch that includes a fallback function that generates UUIDs from rand (version 4 from RFC 4122, the UUID description). The only

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-10/msg00041.html (6,372 bytes)

282. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC, new version (score: 36)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 19:42:26 +0200

WOW great work! It is much better now. I wonder if it is possible to remove the dependency from libuuid, maybe provide replacement for uuid_generate and uuid_unparse when libuuid is not found? Even a

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-10/msg00040.html (6,494 bytes)

283. [Bug-wget] WARC, new version (score: 41)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:00:42 +0200

Hi all, Based on the comments by Giuseppe and Ángel I've revised the implementation of the wget WARC extenstion. I've attached a patch. 1. It's no longer based on the warctools library. Instead, I'v

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-10/msg00039.html (6,222 bytes)

284. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 36)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 21:51:31 +0200

Hi Giuseppe and Ángel, Thanks for looking at the patch. Yes, it's quite big. (I should mention that this was also not my intention to have this complete patch added into the wget repository; it is a

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-10/msg00020.html (6,039 bytes)

285. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 36)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 21:10:28 +0200

Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: the patch is huge and I think we don't want to add some many files into the wget tree. Can't we assume the user will install the warc tools by herself and let configure check

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-10/msg00019.html (5,324 bytes)

286. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 35)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:29:35 +0200

Hi Gijs, the patch is huge and I think we don't want to add some many files into the wget tree. Can't we assume the user will install the warc tools by herself and let configure check if they are ins

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-10/msg00018.html (5,073 bytes)

287. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 34)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:02:22 +0200

Here's the diff of the WARC additions (1.9MB zipped) to revision 2565: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/365100/wget_warc-20110926-complete.patch.bz2 Thanks, Gijs

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-09/msg00049.html (4,624 bytes)

288. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 34)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:48:35 +0200

can you please send a complete diff against the current development tree version? I'll take a look at it ASAP. Thanks, Giuseppe

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-09/msg00041.html (4,558 bytes)

289. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 34)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:11:11 +0200

Hi. It's been a while since we've discussed the WARC addition to Wget. Is there anything I can help with? Gijs

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-09/msg00039.html (4,332 bytes)

290. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 37)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:59:33 +0200

Yes, most changes are necessary. For example, I added a method to add a WARC header that was missing; I changed the WARC version; I changed the handling of file size limits et cetera. Gijs

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-08/msg00030.html (5,159 bytes)

291. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 36)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:20:03 +0200

not something we want to rewrite :-) do they influence the way wget+warc works? that is great, only code which is going into wget has to follow GNU standards. Other libraries can have any style, unti

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-08/msg00029.html (5,245 bytes)

292. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 41)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:38:51 +0200

The library comes with some utilities, an HTTrack plugin, a Java module etc. These extra things are not needed for Wget. But of the C library, I used pretty much everything. The library handles all t

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-08/msg00028.html (6,377 bytes)

293. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 41)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:57:24 +0200

Sure we do! Can you please track all contributors? Any contribution to GNU wget requires copyright assigments to the FSF. Sure, I will take a look at the code in the next days. In the meanwhile, can

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-08/msg00027.html (5,972 bytes)

294. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 56)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:42:10 -0500

That sounds awesome! You have my vote... :) -- ** *Patrick Steil | ChurchBuzz.org* Church Website Optimization <http://www.churchbuzz.org/> Like us on Facebook <http://facebook.com/churchbuzz>! Mobil

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-08/msg00026.html (8,732 bytes)

295. [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 52)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:49:56 +0200

Hi, I'd like to propose a new feature that allows Wget to make WARC files. Perhaps you're already familiar with it, but in short: WARC is a file format for web archives. In a single WARC file, you ca

/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-08/msg00025.html (7,485 bytes)