[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Access-activists] Re: [Accessibility] Accessibility Status: Swamped

From: Piñeiro
Subject: Re: [Access-activists] Re: [Accessibility] Accessibility Status: Swamped
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:12:39 +0200 (CEST)

From: Joanmarie Diggs <address@hidden>

> We need to remedy this Orca problem independent of the CORBA/D-Bus
> problem. That way, once things are fixed in both, Orca can become the
> screen reader of choice due to the compelling, competitive, performant,
> and free access it provides.

Yes of course. Sorry, my previous mail was not clear enough.

I was not trying to say that in order to improve Orca performance, we
should focus *only* in improve at-spi2 performance. I was trying to
say that Orca performance issues can also be improved if at-spi2
performance at-spi2 is improved.

Probably being too optimistic, I was trying to say that if we have
enough resources, it would be good to
  a) have people assigned to improve Orca performance
  b) have people assigned to improve at-spi2 performance

As b) would mean a indirect way to improve Orca performance.

Of course, now we need to decide the priorities. As Mike Gorse (and
Mark Doffman?) is already using part of his time on at-spi2, probably
new teams can start working directly on Orca.

Sorry for not explain myself properly in my previous mail, and sorry
for the noise.


API (address@hidden)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]