aeskulap-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Aeskulap-users] Aeskulap install


From: Alexander Pipelka
Subject: Re: [Aeskulap-users] Aeskulap install
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:58:28 +0200

Am Dienstag, den 22.08.2006, 13:47 -0400 schrieb Antoine Renault:
> Ok, I understand Aeskulap doesn't support Verification as a SCP
> (C-echo), but when you say that you can query and retrieve it implies
> that it does provide DICOM Storage as a SCP (retrieve).
> Querying being a C-find command and retrieving a C-move request.
Right. The SCP Service is currently only active during the C-Move
request.

> Well, in any case let try to get this implemented.
> I think it would be possible to drum up some community participation,
> as my post on the OsiriX bulletin board seems to indicate.
> There is an actual board dedicated to the port of OsiriX to linux (not
> very active, though).
Would be great.

> I really love the project, so lets try to make it grow.
Yeah. I have whole bunch of uncommited changes in my local CVS working
dir. Maybe I'll find some time to polish and commit that stuff. :)

Alex

> On Aug 22, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Alexander Pipelka wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Am Montag, den 21.08.2006, 17:39 -0400 schrieb Antoine:
> > > Ok, I got Aeskulap installed.
> > > I can query my PACS, and do a C-Echo; but my PACS can't C-Echo
> > > Aeskulap.
> > > I tried to push a series to it without success.
> > 
> > 
> > Currently, Aeskulap doesn't act as a Dicom SCP.
> > So, you are able to query and retrieve studies from your PACS but
> > you
> > can't perform a C-Store pushing images directly to Aeskulap.
> > 
> > 
> > > When doing netstat -nl, it shows a listening port 6000 at 0.0.0.0
> > > local
> > > address.
> > > Shouldn't this be 127.0.0.1 ?
> > 
> > 
> > As said above. The port is in use by Aeskulap but there's currently
> > no
> > SCP service listening for incoming requests.
> > 
> > 
> > Alex
> > 
> > 
> > > I appreciate your help.
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   -A.R.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 19:33 +0200, Alexander Pipelka wrote:
> > > > Am Mittwoch, den 16.08.2006, 17:03 -0400 schrieb Antoine:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > I'm struggling with libglademm on Ubuntu 6.0.6.
> > > > The Aeskulap üackage on Dapper compiles fine. There is even a
> > > > package
> > > > for Dapper at the Website (Downloads section).
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Ubuntu only provides libglademm-2.4 when Aeskulap requires
> > > > > 2.6.
> > > > Right. Nearly. :)
> > > > Dapper provides libglademm-2.4 but with a version of 2.6.2.
> > > > So it should compile out of the box.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Can someone walk me through the compiling process?
> > > > - Install the dependencies (libgtkmm, libglademm, ..) and the
> > > > development packages (libgtkmm-dev, libglademm-dev).
> > > > - Untar the aeskulap sources.
> > > > - ./configure --prefix=/usr
> > > > - make
> > > > - sudo make install
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > I downloaded the liglademm-2.6 source and ran ./configure.
> > > > > But when doing make, I get "No target specified and no
> > > > > makefile found".
> > > > No idea. Sorry.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Alex
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Aeskulap-users mailing list
> > > > address@hidden
> > > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aeskulap-users
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aeskulap-users mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aeskulap-users
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aeskulap-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aeskulap-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aeskulap-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aeskulap-users





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]