apps-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNUMail release


From: lukekendall
Subject: Re: GNUMail release
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:47:46 +1100 (EST)

On 20 Jan, Adam Fedor wrote:
>  > Contributions, feedback, comments are always welcomed! Also, we're 

I fetched and installed gnustep-make-1.5.1, gnustep-base-1.5.1,
gnustep-gui-0.8.3-1.i386.rpm and gnustep-gui-0.8.3-1.i386.rpm from 
http://ftpmain.gnustep.org/pub/gnustep/rpms/srpms/.

But when I tried gnustep-back-0.8.3 from there too, it failed like so:

 Compiling file XGGLContext.m ...
cc1obj: warning: changing search order for system directory "/usr/local/include"
cc1obj: warning:   as it has already been specified as a non-system directory
XGGLContext.m: In function `-[XGGLContext initWithFormat:shareContext:]':
XGGLContext.m:275: `GLX_RGBA_TYPE' undeclared (first use in this function)
XGGLContext.m:275: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
XGGLContext.m:275: for each function it appears in.)
make[3]: *** [shared_obj/ix86/linux-gnu/gnu-gnu-gnu/XGGLContext.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [x11.all.subproject.variables] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/gnustep-back-0.8.3/Source/x11'
make[1]: *** [libgnustep-back.all.bundle.variables] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/gnustep-back-0.8.3/Source'
make: *** [internal-all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.973 (%build)

Have I missed something?


Also, I noticed after installing  Pantomime-1.1.0pre1 that the TODO
list doesn't mention what I feel is the only serious problem with
Pantomime: it uses far too much memory, because if you open a large
mailbox it appears not to load the message bodies on demand, but as
soon as you open the mailbox.

This knocked it out of contention as a MUA for me, simply because it
couldn't handle big mailboxes (50MB and up).  It also makes it slow to
open big ones.

Because of the build problem, I didn't get a chance to see whether any
work had been done on that issue.

luke





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]