[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Defining LaTeX-math-list
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Defining LaTeX-math-list |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:49:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 08 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 04 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> IIRC, I once tried to add this, but I couldn't figure out quickly how
>>> to represent `v f' in `LaTeX-math-default'. According to the custom
>>> type of the "Key" in `LaTeX-math-list', key sequences are not allowed.
>>
>> Does the following change work for you?
>
>> - (setq key (if (numberp key) (char-to-string key) (vector key)))
>> + (setq key (cond ((numberp key) (char-to-string key))
>> + ((stringp key) (kbd key))
>> + (t (vector key))))
>
> No, compiling `latex.el' fails while evaluating this form...
>
> (let ((math (reverse (append LaTeX-math-list LaTeX-math-default)))
> (map LaTeX-math-keymap)
> (unicode (and LaTeX-math-menu-unicode (fboundp 'decode-char))))
>
> with...
>
> Then, edebugging `kbd' (a macro) shows that the argument received by
> `kbd' is the *symbol* `key'.
Uh, yes.
> When using `read-kbd-macro' instead of `kbd' it compiles, and is
> seems to work. So I committed it and added keys for \var*.
Thanks.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- [AUCTeX] Re: Defining LaTeX-math-list, (continued)
- [AUCTeX] Re: Defining LaTeX-math-list, Andreas Matthias, 2006/09/05
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Defining LaTeX-math-list, Ralf Angeli, 2006/09/05
- [AUCTeX] Re: Defining LaTeX-math-list, Andreas Matthias, 2006/09/06
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Defining LaTeX-math-list, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Defining LaTeX-math-list, Ralf Angeli, 2006/09/06
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: Defining LaTeX-math-list, David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- [AUCTeX] Re: Defining LaTeX-math-list, Reiner Steib, 2006/09/08