[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] preview \cite
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] preview \cite |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:29:53 +0200 |
* emacs user (2011-03-27) writes:
>> Hm, that's odd. A cause for the problem could be that preview-latex
>> gets confused by some unbalanced parenthesis in the log output. Looking
>> at the output you sent I could not see anything obvious. Does it get
>> better if you enable file:line:error messages in your TeX system?
>
> I used
>
> %%% Local Variables:
> %%% mode: LaTeX
> %%% LaTeX-command: "latex --file-line-error-style"
> %%% TeX-master: t
> %%% TeX-PDF-mode: t
> %%% End:
>
> to add this option, and am attaching the log with and without this.
> it didn't seem to help. best, Eli
In the log you sent I saw that you seem to be running a preview-latex
command other than `preview-document'. (Something I failed to notice in
the original log you sent.) Commands like `preview-at-point' or
`preview-buffer' generate previews by running LaTeX on a LaTeX file
which is just a part of the whole file. However, preview-latex does not
run BibTeX on this file, so the necessary data to resolve the reference
is missing. That's why you see a question mark in the preview.
You can work around this by running `preview-document' instead one of
the preview commands which only operate on a part of the document (and
make sure that BibTeX was run before) or by running BibTeX manually on
the _region_.tex file mentioned above. The latter workaround does not
seem very practical, though.
I don't think we'll see preview-latex automatically running stuff like
BibTeX soon because we don't even have this feature yet in AUCTeX.
--
Ralf
- Re: [AUCTeX] preview \cite,
Ralf Angeli <=