[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX] preview vs beamer

From: Nicolas Richard
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] preview vs beamer
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:05:47 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux)

Hello Tassilo,

Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden writes:
>> | ! Undefined control sequence.
>> | address@hidden@Output address@hidden@Shipout 
>> |                                                   \box address@hidden 
>> | l.5 \end{document}
>> |                   

> I can reproduce that but I don't know how to fix it. :-(

I stumbled accross the very same problem today, when updating to TL2014
(I was still with TL2012 before that).

It seems that pgf is at fault, see :
for a workaround.

Now this raises a question : why would pgf try to fix a compatibility
problem between preview and everyshi... I have no idea. They claim (in
my pgfutil-latex.def file) :
% Preview hack: preview.sty hacks into \shipout (which is ok), but
% does not honour everyshi.sty (which is not ok). This causes everyshi
% material to get lost.

Perhaps preview-latex needs fixing in this area ? I don't know.

Nicolas Richard

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]