autoconf-archive-maintainers | |
[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: boost macros use non-portable tac
From: |
Peter Simons |
Subject: |
Re: boost macros use non-portable tac |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:01:59 +0200 |
Hi Peter,
> According to Autoconf manual
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf.html#Limitations-of-
> Usual-Tools
>
> "portable options are -acdilrtu".
very good! In that case, ls -r is clearly preferable over tac.
> One could try first try linking against '-lboost_system-mt' and then
> against '-lboost-system'. The linker knows much better than us what
> suffixes libraries have on the system. If people don't mind that
> change, I can prepare a patch. WDYT?
IMHO, using the linker to determine which of those libraries exist is
the way to go. I'm very much in favor of that.
Take care,
Peter
- boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Johansson, 2012/09/24
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Simons, 2012/09/26
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Johansson, 2012/09/26
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Johansson, 2012/09/26
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac,
Peter Simons <=
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Johansson, 2012/09/27
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Simons, 2012/09/29
- Re: boost macros use non-portable tac, Peter Johansson, 2012/09/30
- PATCH AX_BOOST_THREAD for OSX [was: boost macros use non-portable tac], Peter Johansson, 2012/09/30
- Re: PATCH AX_BOOST_THREAD for OSX [was: boost macros use non-portable tac], Peter Simons, 2012/09/30