Re: Fix `set -o posix' again

[Paul Eggert]

address@hidden (Eric Blake) writes:

> how likely are we to have a shell that has an option that has the
> substring "posix", without also supporting the actual option
> "posix"?

Not that likely, I suppose.  I was trying to be safe, and perhaps it
was overkill.

> case `set -o 2>/dev/null` in

We need the parens around the 'set -o'.  Otherwise some older shells
that lack 'set -o' will output to the original stderr, not the
redirected one.