[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time for Autoconf 2.61a?
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: Time for Autoconf 2.61a? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 05:56:34 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Paul Eggert on 12/11/2006 12:17 AM:
> Would anyone object if I produced an Autoconf 2.61a test version and
> put it out on alpha.gnu.org? This might help people test Autoconf's
> recent Awk-related changes more.
Do we want to go with libtool-like numbering, where ace... (odd letters)
are reserved for CVS builds, and bdf... (even letters) denote snapshots
uploaded to alpha.gnu.org? Other than the choice of the number, I agree
that uploading a snapshot would be worthwhile.
- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFfVWC84KuGfSFAYARAiU/AKCDGcpj18837rsCyaQAT/376zPhyACeMrvf
ivF5oXjWOcJgUEc3oV6bvBI=
=OhE4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----