[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4 |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:57:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
* Eric Blake wrote on Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 02:40:23PM CEST:
>
> If CR is _not_ the EOL marker, then how would CR appear at the end of the
> line?
It could be part of the EOL marker: a dos file read in unix mode.
> Where are we doing input into $tmp/subs1.awk that could create a
> spurious CR if the platform does not use CR?
The configure.ac author may be.
> And if CR is not EOL, then do we really need to escape intermediate CR
> rather than treating it as a literal character?
Yes, for awk we do. Some awks may throw an error otherwise, I forgot
which, but it was discussed on autoconf-patches.
Cheers,
Ralf
- carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Working os/2 configuratie, Elbert Pol, 2008/04/05
- Re: Working os/2 configuratie, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
- Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05