[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66 |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:20:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 02:15:41PM CEST:
> On 07/10/2010 08:18 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >I've pushed the patch now but dropped the addition of `+' from _AS_TR_SH
> >on the grounds that we should only add what we expose in the testsuite.
> >Hope you don't mind.
>
> This breaks GCC. Is this worth a blitz 2.67 release?
What breaks GCC? The commit I just pushed this morning or the `+'
thingy that I excluded from the commit? Please do not answer yes or no.
If it's the `+', then show how and where it fails, so we can add
testsuite exposure for it when fixing that.
Thanks,
Ralf
- Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/06
- Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66, Eric Blake, 2010/07/07
- Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/08
- Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/10
- Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/07/10
- Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/07/10
- Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/10
- Re: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66, Eric Blake, 2010/07/10
- AC_INIT regression [was: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66], Eric Blake, 2010/07/10
- Re: AC_INIT regression [was: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *]) is error in autoconf-2.66], Paolo Bonzini, 2010/07/10
- Re: AC_INIT regression, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/11
- Re: AC_INIT regression, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/07/11
- Re: AC_INIT regression, Paul Eggert, 2010/07/12
- Re: AC_INIT regression, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/13
- Re: AC_INIT regression, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/15