[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go?
From: |
Morten Eriksen |
Subject: |
Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? |
Date: |
22 Nov 2000 23:38:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.3 |
Paul Berrevoets <address@hidden> writes:
> [...] for AC_EXEEXT please take into consideration that on UWIN
> (which uses a cc wrapper for MSVC), the compiler also generates a
> .pdb file, which if you don't filter it out along with .obj, would
> be used as the extension for executables.
I've had a patch in the pipeline for AC_EXEEXT for quite some time
now, which would not fall into the trap you decribe. See below.
There was a lot of discussion and many rewrites, but I don't think I
ever got a definitive "no" on the (so far) final version below. I even
think I got at least one "yes" from one of the maintainers, so I
really don't know why it wasn't applied.
Regards,
Morten
exeext6.diff
Description: Text document
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go?, (continued)
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go?, Earnie Boyd, 2000/11/20
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go?, Mo DeJong, 2000/11/20
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go?, Morten Eriksen, 2000/11/22
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go?, Paul Berrevoets, 2000/11/22
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? (patch suggestion), Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/22
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? (patch suggestion), Paul Berrevoets, 2000/11/22
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? (patch suggestion), Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/22
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? (patch suggestion), Paul Berrevoets, 2000/11/22
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go?,
Morten Eriksen <=
Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go?, Earnie Boyd, 2000/11/22
RE: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go?, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/11/23