[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log
From: |
Lars J. Aas |
Subject: |
Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 20:30:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:31:23PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
: Lars J. Aas writes:
: > - [configure (AC_PACKAGE_STRING) AC_ACVERSION])])
: > + [AC_PACKAGE_STRING configure, by GNU Autoconf
AC_ACVERSION])])
:
: A Gnits dude would probably prefer
:
: configure (AC_PACKAGE_NAME) AC_PACKAGE_VERSION
: generated by GNU Autoconf AC_ACVERSION
Or
configure (AC_PACKAGE_STRING)
generated by GNU Autoconf AC_ACVERSION
This depends on whether or not you believe the version number of the
configure script follows the version number of the package. I don't
think a configure-script really has a version number in that sense -
it should in that case be a combination of the configure.in-revision
and the autoconf version, but that's just me.
Lars J
- Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Ralf Corsepius, 2001/03/27
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/03/27
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/03/27
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log,
Lars J. Aas <=
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/03/28
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Lars J. Aas, 2001/03/29
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Derek R. Price, 2001/03/29
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Lars J. Aas, 2001/03/29
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Derek R. Price, 2001/03/29
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/03/29
- RE: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Tim Van Holder, 2001/03/29
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Derek R. Price, 2001/03/29
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Ivan Vlaev, 2001/03/29
- Re: Confusing/bogus message in config.log, Derek R. Price, 2001/03/29