[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reverse AC_REQUIRE and AC_CHECK_TYPE changes?
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
Re: Reverse AC_REQUIRE and AC_CHECK_TYPE changes? |
|
Date: |
04 Aug 2001 15:57:37 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor) |
>>>>> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <address@hidden> writes:
Lars> I think Adam wants a macro, lets call it
Lars> "AC_ENSURE_INVOKED([MACRO])", that doesn't do dependencies
Lars> between macros, but does make a dependency between having
Lars> invoked the macro, and the point of the ensurance macro
Lars> invokation.
I understood :)
Lars> That would have meaning at the top-level. Is such a macro
Lars> desirable?
I don't think so.
Lars> I don't have a need for it, so I'm just asking...
It's named m4_expand_once([MACRO-NAME]), but I wouldn't use it.