[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: possibly undefined macro: dnl
|
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
|
Subject: |
Re: possibly undefined macro: dnl |
|
Date: |
09 Aug 2001 12:35:26 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
Akim> Sure. But the hypothesis is `the first files have been more tested
Akim> and are less likely to be guilty'.
Akim> For instance, it makes no sense to look for an unexpanded AC_TRY_RUN
Akim> in autoconf.m4, or an AT_CHECK in autotest/general.m4. The idea is
Akim> user files are last, and user files are more suspicious than lib
Akim> files.
The penny's dropped! I wasn't considering Autoconf as part of
the sources. Please excuse this user bias :).
[...]
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz