autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: autoconf-2.52 not a speed demon ?? --


From: Ralf Corsepius
Subject: Re: autoconf-2.52 not a speed demon ?? --
Date: 02 Nov 2001 07:13:00 +0100

Am Mit, 2001-10-31 um 22.22 schrieb Thomas Dickey:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 06:23:46AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> > On 31 Oct 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > 
> > > >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Dickey <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > > Thomas> there were claims on this mailing list that 2.50 was 3 times
> > > Thomas> faster than 2.13 (so you're saying that 2.52x is ~60 times
> > > Thomas> slower than 2.50)
> > >
> > > Wow!  That's quite impressive.  Who said that about autoconf?
> > 
> > I may still have it in my email (will look for it tonight).
> 
> sorry - I don't see it in a relevant timeframe (June 2000 to June 2001).
> 
> perhaps I'm recalling an older discussion (or perhaps I discarded that email,
> thinking that I would not need to refer to it).
FWIW: I once compared
autoconf-2.13+automake-1.4
and
autoconf-2.49f+automake-1.4
for a large package I am involved into.

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/autoconf/2001-05/msg00157.html

Ralf





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]