[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DOS path
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: DOS path |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:46:23 -0800 (PST) |
> From: John Poltorak <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:21:20 +0000
>
> What is the recommended way of treating a DOS path such as? :-
>
> c:\def\ghij;k:\lm;
>
>
> Should some attempt be made to convert '\' to '/' before running autoconf
> or configure,
That's what I'd do, yes.
In fact, I'd go further and insist on a PATH that conforms to POSIX,
and uses ":" as a separator. My understanding is that the better DOS
development environments support that. (Use one of those. :-)
- DOS path, John Poltorak, 2002/02/13
- Re: DOS path,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: DOS path, Tim Van Holder, 2002/02/14
- Re: DOS path, John Poltorak, 2002/02/14
- Re: DOS path, Tim Van Holder, 2002/02/14
- Re: DOS path, John Poltorak, 2002/02/14
- Re: DOS path, Tim Van Holder, 2002/02/14
- Re: DOS path, John Poltorak, 2002/02/14
- Re: DOS path, Thomas E. Dickey, 2002/02/14
- Re: DOS path, Tim Van Holder, 2002/02/14
- Re: DOS path, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/14