[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: aclocal question (AM_ICONV)
From: |
Bill Moseley |
Subject: |
Re: aclocal question (AM_ICONV) |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:12:19 -0700 |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> You should configure both packages using the same --prefix.
>> Choose either /usr or /usr/local, but don't mix both.
Thanks -- upgrading automake fixed that problem.
Am I required to use automake for my project? We already have configure.in
and Makefile.in (hand-built) and are not using Makefile.am.
I'm trying to add in the AM_ICONV macro, but I think I'm not understanding
how the parts fit together.
I add to our configure.in:
dnl Check for ICONV support
AM_ICONV
Then run
$ aclocal
$ autoconf
$ ./configure
...
configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in . ./.. ./../..
I noticed in the libxml2 configure.in file the tests for iconv, so would it
be better to just copy that section from the libxml2 script? Probably faster.
Looks like I need to read chapter 23 in my copy of GNU Autoconf book...
--
Bill Moseley
mailto:address@hidden