autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: aclocal question (AM_ICONV)


From: Bill Moseley
Subject: Re: aclocal question (AM_ICONV)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:12:19 -0700

Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> You should configure both packages using the same --prefix.
>> Choose either /usr or /usr/local, but don't mix both.

Thanks -- upgrading automake fixed that problem.

Am I required to use automake for my project?  We already have configure.in
and Makefile.in (hand-built) and are not using Makefile.am.

I'm trying to add in the AM_ICONV macro, but I think I'm not understanding
how the parts fit together.

I add to our configure.in:

  dnl Check for ICONV support
  AM_ICONV

Then run

  $ aclocal
  $ autoconf
  $ ./configure
  ...
  configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in . ./.. ./../..

I noticed in the libxml2 configure.in file the tests for iconv, so would it
be better to just copy that section from the libxml2 script?  Probably faster.

 
Looks like I need to read chapter 23 in my copy of GNU Autoconf book...




-- 
Bill Moseley
mailto:address@hidden




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]