[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [G95] planned obsolescence?
From: |
Steven Bosscher |
Subject: |
Re: [G95] planned obsolescence? |
Date: |
20 Jan 2003 08:23:36 +0100 |
Op ma 20-01-2003, om 03:29 schreef Steven G. Johnson:
> On 20 Jan 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > It would certainly help if autoconf and automake would start supporting
> > $(FC). The bulk of the work already exists, even for automake. It's
> > just a matter of accepting it.
>
> I agree that Fortran 9x+ support in autoconf is important pending issue
> for 2003. This issue has becoming more and more critical over the last
> few years, although the need has been dampened somewhat by the lack of a
> free f9x compiler.
Well, that's a big of a chicken-and-egg problem, don't you think?
It really won't be *that* long before we'll see g95 included in gcc, I'd
certainly hope we get that over with before the end of 2003. After all,
that still *is* one of the primary goals in the short term.
Greetz
Steven