[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Library path with AC_CHECK_LIB
From: |
moseley |
Subject: |
Re: Library path with AC_CHECK_LIB |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Jun 2003 09:16:38 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:23:15AM -0400, Assar Westerlund wrote:
> Bill Moseley <address@hidden> writes:
> > I was building our package on a Solaris 2.6 machine and ended up with:
> >
> > ld: fatal: library -lz: not found
> >
> > On this machine libz is in /usr/local/lib.
> >
> I can only guess that this happens because the compiler/linker and/or
> flags are different between the link that succeeds at configure-time
> and the one that fails at make-time.
Yes, I assumed that.
>
> You'll have to look through config.log to find the actual command that
> worked.
I looked and didn't find anything telling. All I see is this:
configure:11703: checking for gzread in -lz
configure:11734: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Imaybe/include -Lmaybe/lib
conftest.c -lz -lm >&5
configure:11737: $? = 0
configure:11740: test -s conftest
configure:11743: $? = 0
so I'm not really clear what "maybe/include" is in that output.
--
Bill Moseley
address@hidden
- Library path with AC_CHECK_LIB, Bill Moseley, 2003/06/04
- Re: Library path with AC_CHECK_LIB, Assar Westerlund, 2003/06/07
- Re: Library path with AC_CHECK_LIB,
moseley <=
- Re: Library path with AC_CHECK_LIB, Assar Westerlund, 2003/06/07
- Re: Library path with AC_CHECK_LIB, Bill Moseley, 2003/06/07
- Re: Library path with AC_CHECK_LIB, moseley, 2003/06/11
- Re: Library path with AC_CHECK_LIB, Lars Hecking, 2003/06/11
- Re: Library path with AC_CHECK_LIB, Paul Eggert, 2003/06/11
- Re: Library path with AC_CHECK_LIB, Bill Moseley, 2003/06/11