Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99

[Paul Eggert]

"Kevin P. Fleming" <address@hidden> writes:

>  From a plain-old-user's point of view, I'd much rather see Roger's
> original version. I don't want to rely on undocumented autoconf
> internals any more than I have to.

Part of the motivation for keeping that stuff hidden is that we don't
want people to switch based on whether our macro "thinks" the compiler
is "C99" or "C89" or "not".  They should switch based on the
particular feature that they need.