[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test? |
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2005 11:50:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello,
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:44:16AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > It's hard to tell whether a macro calls AC_REQUIRE. (It can call it
> > indirectly.)
> True, ... but ...
>
> ... in practice in most cases AC_PROG_<language> will be close to the
> beginning of a configure script before "feature checks". So unless you
> are doing something nasty, this in most cases works around the
> AC_REQUIRE issue. If this wasn't the case, autoconf would completely
> unusable.
thank you very much for explaining this to me.
I have much less practical experience with autoconf than theoretical
knowledge about it.
Have a nice day,
Stepan
- to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Ed Hartnett, 2005/05/20
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/05/25
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Stepan Kasal, 2005/05/26
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/05/27
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Stepan Kasal, 2005/05/27
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/05/27
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?,
Stepan Kasal <=