[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC: Does hand editing of "config.h" make sense?

From: Bernd Jendrissek
Subject: Re: RFC: Does hand editing of "config.h" make sense?
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:23:12 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:41:22PM +0100, Keith MARSHALL wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote, quoting me:
> > Unfortunately, while the user is able to add definitions, I am not
> > aware of a way to remove definitions other than to edit the
> > configured header files.
> And, as Stepan has already noted, the ability to exclude definitions,
> which configure has already added, could be potentially *more* useful
> than adding those which configure thinks you shouldn't; IME, an
> autoconf generated configure doesn't usually get this wrong!

You mean you want a two-way config.h pattern like this?

/* Define to 1 if you have <risky/header.h> */
/* #undef HAVE_RISKY_HEADER_H */

[This must be a new record for responding to old messages. :]

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]