Re: String functions with end pointers?

[Paul D. Smith]

%% Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

  pe> Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
  pe> char *memechr(const char *str, const char *endp, char c);

  pe> Come to think of it, this kind of signature isn't right for the mem*
  pe> family, and I suppose it should be something like this instead:

  pe> void *memechr(const void *mem, const void *endp, unsigned char c);


 void *memechr(const void *mem, const void *endp, uint8_t c);

!!

:-)

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Paul D. Smith <address@hidden>          Find some GNU make tips at:
 http://www.gnu.org                      http://make.paulandlesley.org
 "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist