[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "has changed since the previous run"
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: "has changed since the previous run" |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Feb 2007 19:55:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:04:48PM CET:
> Quoting Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>:
> >DJ Delorie <address@hidden> writes:
> >>They share config.cache, because it saves a lot of time.
> >
> >Not any more. Nowadays every configured subdirectory gets its own cache.
>
> This question is a bit off topic but I'd be interested in knowing why you
> changed this. I also have a big project in which sub-configures are
> conditionally picked up by the top-level configure and called during
> ``make all'' and they all share the same cache which speeds up
> significantly the build.
GCC does that (partly). Doesn't apply to users of Autoconf's
AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS. If you use that, it will share the cache.
I assume that your project is not nearly as complex as GCC is
in terms of build machinery. A combined tree has several dozen
configure scripts, and uses several fewer config.cache files,
i.e., there is some sharing.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/01
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", Benoit Sigoure, 2007/02/01
- Re: "has changed since the previous run",
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", DJ Delorie, 2007/02/01
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", Ralf Corsepius, 2007/02/02
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", DJ Delorie, 2007/02/01
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", DJ Delorie, 2007/02/01
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", Ralf Corsepius, 2007/02/02
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", DJ Delorie, 2007/02/01
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/02/02
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", DJ Delorie, 2007/02/02
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/02/02
- Re: "has changed since the previous run", Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/02/02