[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co |
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2007 09:31:36 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Patrick Welche <address@hidden> writes:
> Sorry for getting email trigger happy - I seem to still be confused... If
> AC_TYPE_UINT8_T
> is run on a system without uint8_t, a typdef for uint8_t appears in config.h,
> but it is only created at the end of configure, so how would a subsequent
> test in configure see the typedef?
Shell code could look at a cache variable, I suppose. But the bigger
question is: why would a later test care?
- AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/28
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Eric Blake, 2007/05/28
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Stepan Kasal, 2007/05/28
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/29
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/29
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Stepan Kasal, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Stepan Kasal, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Stepan Kasal, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/31
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/29
Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/29