[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
autoreconf vs autogen.sh
From: |
David Bruce |
Subject: |
autoreconf vs autogen.sh |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:33:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
Hi,
I've inherited an autotools-using project and am trying to learn more about
autoconf and automake. The project has used the following brief autogen.sh:
aclocal && autoheader && autoconf && automake --add-missing --copy
Is there any reason I can't just use autoreconf, which I understand is
supposed to fill this role?
(I've read the fine manual but want to be sure I understand correctly).
Thanks,
--
David Bruce
- autoreconf vs autogen.sh,
David Bruce <=
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/25
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Noah Misch, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Andreas Schwab, 2007/08/27
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Noah Misch, 2007/08/25