autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: conversion to git


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: conversion to git
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:25:10 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070728 Thunderbird/2.0.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Bob Friesenhahn on 9/19/2007 7:12 PM:

Hi Bob,

>>
>> The initial git import is complete.  Feel free to check it out:
>>
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=autoconf.git
> 
> What is the purpose of converting to git?

Primarily speed, but also security.  In particular, Bruno found a rather
telling flaw in the CVS model of pushing all local files to the server,
and letting the server do all the work:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-03/msg00474.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-cvs/2007-01/msg00018.html

Distributed version control systems (dvcs) do not have this flaw.

Personally, I enjoy the speed of browsing history on my own machine with
gitk rather than the slowness that is cvsweb.  It makes archeological digs
through version control much faster.

Other benefits - git can trace file renames, and has a much more efficient
branching scheme than CVS.   Which means simultaneous development on
unrelated topic branches is much easier to manage.

>  Is this a political statement
> (e.g. "Linux GNU" vs "GNU Linux") or is there a concrete purpose?  What
> is the cost vs benefit of the conversion?  Who participated in the
> decision to make this conversion?

The gnulib list made the conversion first; it has been discussed there for
nearly half a year, and the group consensus was that git provided enough
benefits that it was worth switching, provided that read-only CVS access
was still possible.  For example:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=conversion+git&submit=Search%21&idxname=bug-gnulib&max=20&result=normal&sort=score

A reasonable number of the autoconf maintainers follow the gnulib list.
And for those that don't, I stand by my promise to keep both the CVS and
git repositories in sync for a while longer, until we are sure that the
time has come to favor the git repository.  I just hope it is faster than
the 6 months it took gnulib (although a lot of that delay was waiting for
git 1.5.3 to be released, as well as infrastructure improvements on
savannah to support git-based projects).

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG8cv284KuGfSFAYARAmyEAJ9Xxo1FzMdth7EQdQv2f8Oq8TeHfgCg0twD
RQJpIBAk4KUGMT+Vm4o7/d0=
=G/nK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]