[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT'
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT' |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:45:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
Hello Ludovic,
* Ludovic Courtès wrote on Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 09:36:58PM CET:
>
> I've seen people reporting `configure' failures due to
> "cannot compile sizeof (char)". Investigating the issue, it turned out
> to be that, in a native compilation environment, the executable produced
> by `AC_COMPUTE_INT' could not be run because some library specified in
> `$LIBS' was not in `$LD_LIBRARY_PATH'.
>
> Hence my question: why not always use `AC_COMPUTE_INT_COMPILE' instead
> of `AC_COMPUTE_INT_RUN'?
But a library that will not be found by the runtime linker is a problem
for all run tests, not just AC_COMPUTE_INT. The normal way to go about
this is to ensure that libraries are found; see for example the macros
from the gnulib module 'havelib'.
The other possibility you could go about if you need to avoid run tests
is to set $cross_compiling to yes.
> I realize the former might be slower in some
> cases, because of the binary search, but maybe not that slower with
> small integers as is the case with `AC_CHECK_SIZEOF', and probably more
> reliable.
Well, it needs up to 'sizeof(long) * CHAR_BIT' compile steps for large
values (but fewer for small ones; IIRC it was skewed towards small
values).
Cheers,
Ralf
- Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT', Ludovic Courtès, 2008/03/18
- Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT',
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT', Ludovic Courtès, 2008/03/18
- Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT', Ineiev, 2008/03/19
- Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT', Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/20
- Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT', Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/20
- Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT', Andreas Schwab, 2008/03/20
- Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT', Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/20
- Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT', Ineiev, 2008/03/21
- Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT', Eric Blake, 2008/03/21
- Re: Implementation of `AC_COMPUTE_INT', Ineiev, 2008/03/22