[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: make -s, how to make it quiet?

From: 'Ralf Wildenhues'
Subject: Re: make -s, how to make it quiet?
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:03:30 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 08:36:36PM CEST:
> But the same make works fine for u-boot, u-boot does not use auto* as
> far as I know.

That's not proof that automake is at fault.  It could be, but I don't
see it.

> "grep echo Makefile" in auto* generated Makefile shows
> ECHO = echo
>           echo " $(INSTALL_DATA) $$p $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/$$p"; \
>           echo " $(RANLIB) $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/$$p"; \
>           echo "$(LIBTOOL)  --mode=install $(INSTALL) $$p 
> $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/$$p"; \
>           echo " $(LIBTOOL)  --mode=install $(INSTALL_PROGRAM) $$p 
> $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/`echo $$p|sed 's/$(EXEEXT)$$//'|sed '$(transform)'|sed 
> 's/$$/$(EXEEXT)/'`"; \
>           $(LIBTOOL)  --mode=install $(INSTALL_PROGRAM) $$p 
> $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/`echo $$p|sed 's/$(EXEEXT)$$//'|sed '$(transform)'|sed 
> 's/$$/$(EXEEXT)/'`; \
>         rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/`echo $$p|sed 's/$(EXEEXT)$$//'|sed 
> '$(transform)'|sed 's/$$/$(EXEEXT)/'`; \
>       unique=`for i in $$list; do echo $$i; done | \
>       unique=`for i in $$list; do echo $$i; done | \
>       @echo '$(COMPILE) -c $<'; \
>       @echo '$(LTCOMPILE) -c $<'; \
>       @echo "This command is intended for maintainers to use;"
>       @echo "it deletes files that may require special tools to rebuild."
> Notice the "@echo '$(COMPILE) -c $<'; \"
> Seems like the is a deliberate echo there

Yes.  But it doesn't mean that this command line was created by
automake, and not put like this in

I'm sorry, but if this is to be getting anywhere, you will either have
to debug this further, or provide more detail to help us analyze it
(like providing the automake version used for this package, and all the
other stuff that I wondered about in my previous post).  For example,
you could also post a link to a tarball of the package in question, then
we could just look at it.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]